raf1212 Posted May 17, 2019 Share Posted May 17, 2019 first 5 test CPUs at 30/40 percent and here my netduma stopped working (bug)page like at reboot but you do not hear the signal LEDs flash normally, rebot on the page does not work statement(Missing JSON response) I disconnected from electricity it helped, another 10 tests the processor once showed only a jump to 90 percent,the rest normally and now only such messages Fri May 17 16:56:02 2019 daemon.warn odhcpd[737]: Failed to send to ff02::1%br-lan (Operation not permitted) Fri May 17 16:55:15 2019 daemon.info dnsmasq-dhcp[1182]: DHCPREQUEST(br-lan) 192.168.88.111 f0:76:6f:ab:2c:7b Fri May 17 16:59:23 2019 kern.info dpiclass-daemon: Kill flow due to timeout Fri May 17 16:58:13 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 979.336000] send: nf_ct_get failed Fri May 17 16:58:13 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 979.336000] recv: nf_ct_get failed Fri May 17 16:57:53 2019 kern.info dpiclass-daemon: Kill flow due to timeout Fri May 17 16:57:53 2019 kern.info dpiclass-daemon: Kill flow due to timeout Fri May 17 16:57:44 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 951.096000] send: nf_ct_get failed Fri May 17 16:57:44 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 951.096000] recv: nf_ct_get failed Fri May 17 16:57:30 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 936.996000] send: nf_ct_get failed Fri May 17 16:57:30 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 936.996000] recv: nf_ct_get failed Fri May 17 16:57:23 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 929.936000] send: nf_ct_get failed Fri May 17 16:57:23 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 929.936000] recv: nf_ct_get failed Fri May 17 16:57:23 2019 kern.info dpiclass-daemon: Kill flow due to timeout Fri May 17 16:57:23 2019 kern.info dpiclass-daemon: Kill flow due to timeout Fri May 17 16:57:20 2019 kern.info kernel: [ 926.404000] send: nf_ct_get failed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raf1212 Posted May 18, 2019 Share Posted May 18, 2019 a dzisiaj to Sat May 18 06:29:20 2019 kern.info dpiclass-daemon: Kill flow due to timeout Sat May 18 06:28:43 2019 kern.info kernel: [49609.648000] send: nf_ct_get failed Sat May 18 06:28:43 2019 kern.info kernel: [49609.648000] recv: nf_ct_get failed Sat May 18 06:28:36 2019 kern.info kernel: [49602.356000] send: nf_ct_get failed Sat May 18 06:28:36 2019 kern.info kernel: [49602.356000] recv: nf_ct_get failed Sat May 18 06:28:36 2019 kern.info kernel: [49602.356000] send: nf_ct_get failed Sat May 18 06:28:36 2019 kern.info kernel: [49602.356000] recv: nf_ct_get failed Sat May 18 06:27:58 2019 kern.warn kernel: [49564.340000] HTB: quantum of class 10004 is big. Consider r2q change. Sat May 18 06:27:57 2019 kern.warn kernel: [49564.216000] HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. Sat May 18 06:27:57 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.qos: applying qos for zone lan Sat May 18 06:27:57 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.qos: applying qos for zone wan Sat May 18 06:27:37 2019 kern.warn kernel: [49543.908000] HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. Sat May 18 06:27:37 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.qos: applying qos for zone lan Sat May 18 06:27:32 2019 user.warn com.netdumasoftware.devicemanager: RPC call 'get_device_ips' exception 'ERROR: Nonexistent device stack traceback: ?: in function '__new__' ?: in function '?' ?: in function <?:469> (tail call): ? ?: in function 'get_device' ?: in function <?:197> ?: in function <?:324> [C]: in function 'xpcall' ?: in function 'try' ?: in function <?:290> [C]: in function 'run' ?: in function <?:345> [C]: in function 'xpcall' ?: in function 'try' ?: in function <?:261> (taSat May 18 06:27:36 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.qos: applying qos for zone wan Sat May 18 06:27:31 2019 kern.warn kernel: [49537.744000] HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change. Sat May 18 06:27:31 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.qos: applying qos for zone lan Sat May 18 06:27:30 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.qos: applying qos for zone wan Sat May 18 06:27:29 2019 daemon.warn odhcpd[737]: Failed to send to ff02::1%br-lan (Operation not permitted) Sat May 18 06:27:15 2019 kern.info kernel: [49521.704000] send: nf_ct_get failed Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.systeminfo: Ubus object 'com.netdumasoftware.geofilter' added, attempting to bind pending Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7262]: Distance set to 1514 Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7262]: User Engine 7 Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7262]: Kernel thread started Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7262]: Set kernel thread to top FIFO priority Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7261]: Disabled NETLINK returned 0 Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7261]: New buffer size is 262144 Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7261]: Default buffer size 163840 Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7261]: Setting queue buf size is enabled Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7261]: Home coordinate set to (37,-98) Sun May 19 10:25:35 2019 local5.info geoip-daemon[7261]: verdict marking: 1 shift: 19 Sun May 19 10:25:07 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.qos: Ubus object 'com.netdumasoftware.qos' added, attempting to bind pending Sun May 19 10:25:07 2019 user.info com.netdumasoftware.qos: Ubus object 'com.netdumasoftware.hybridvpn' added, attempting to bind pending Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Admin Posted May 18, 2019 Administrators Share Posted May 18, 2019 Thanks for this. We’ll need to check with a dev if these logs are indicative of anything. We’ll get back to you on Monday about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Alex Posted May 20, 2019 Administrators Share Posted May 20, 2019 It looks like Google Translate may have changed the logs you posted. Could you post them again but unmodified? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raf1212 Posted May 20, 2019 Share Posted May 20, 2019 4 hours ago, Netduma Alex said: It looks like Google Translate may have changed the logs you posted. Could you post them again but unmodified? ok, I've edited and improved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted May 24, 2019 Author Share Posted May 24, 2019 Reupgraded to Duma os CPU keeps going to 100% and speeds are slow. Edit: Same issue, speeds are erratic. So now what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted May 26, 2019 Author Share Posted May 26, 2019 No suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raf1212 Posted May 27, 2019 Share Posted May 27, 2019 It's a little strange that nobody answers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Alex Posted May 28, 2019 Administrators Share Posted May 28, 2019 Sorry it was a UK bank holiday yesterday, so nobody was in. I'll check and see if any progress has been made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted May 28, 2019 Author Share Posted May 28, 2019 10 hours ago, Netduma Alex said: Sorry it was a UK bank holiday yesterday, so nobody was in. I'll check and see if any progress has been made. It’s to the point where I can’t use it right now unless it’s the old OS, but the caveat is that we have nat issues with two consoles Here is my current log: log-1559077055178.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted May 28, 2019 Administrators Share Posted May 28, 2019 I can't comment on the log so I'll wait for Alex to respond with feedback from devs. Are you using UPnP or Port Forwarding and do you have any luck if you use one over the other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted May 28, 2019 Author Share Posted May 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Netduma Fraser said: I can't comment on the log so I'll wait for Alex to respond with feedback from devs. Are you using UPnP or Port Forwarding and do you have any luck if you use one over the other? UPNP on OS and the older software. Its fine on OS. My speeds....no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted May 28, 2019 Administrators Share Posted May 28, 2019 Try to use port forwarding instead and forward 3074 for one and 3075 for the other Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted May 29, 2019 Author Share Posted May 29, 2019 15 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Try to use port forwarding instead and forward 3074 for one and 3075 for the other I’m sticking with the DumaOS for right now, it just works better with multiple consoles, but I’d REALLY like to help you guys nail down whatever the issue I’m seeing is. I went through all settings last night to make sure WiFi was off as I have a separate router for WiFi (the tick box was on, but it wasn’t “on” - strange) I also noticed the VPN switch was on, but I have never used it. I have the sliders set for 100% and ticked never - I’ll get max speeds SOMETIMES, but lower speeds often. During this, as suggested - watched the CPU and it hits 100% and the speeds slow down. This happens wired, and wireless on every single device. Log is above. This is one of the first routers, I’m an early adopter, if that matters any. Original firmware has functional QOS, as evidenced in this thread already. Please help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Alex Posted May 29, 2019 Administrators Share Posted May 29, 2019 Devs still working on it I'll check in tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted May 29, 2019 Author Share Posted May 29, 2019 5 minutes ago, Netduma Alex said: Devs still working on it I'll check in tomorrow Ok. Thanks for the update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AMBRO666 Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Similar problem log-1559159539870.txt log-1559159952683.txt log-1559160004417.txt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted May 29, 2019 Administrators Share Posted May 29, 2019 45 minutes ago, AMBRO666 said: Similar problem log-1559159539870.txt 18.24 kB · 0 downloads log-1559159952683.txt 17.1 kB · 0 downloads log-1559160004417.txt 17.16 kB · 0 downloads Hey, welcome to the forum! Are you actually having speed issues or just seeing the same entries in the log? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted May 31, 2019 Author Share Posted May 31, 2019 Any progress? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Alex Posted May 31, 2019 Administrators Share Posted May 31, 2019 We're pretty sure that this is due to the age of your router, it certainly sounds like something caused by hardware. Could you please email us at [email protected] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted May 31, 2019 Author Share Posted May 31, 2019 38 minutes ago, Netduma Alex said: We're pretty sure that this is due to the age of your router, it certainly sounds like something caused by hardware. Could you please email us at [email protected] Sending now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeTHIS Posted June 3, 2019 Author Share Posted June 3, 2019 Never heard anything via email from you guys. I wound up downgrading again because the speeds were too slow and erratic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Alex Posted June 3, 2019 Administrators Share Posted June 3, 2019 Ah sorry you emailed right before I left the office on Friday. I'll respond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The0dark0one Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 So are we not supposed to see these in our logs? I tried searching for this months ago and found nothing. I would love to have this fixed as well, or at the very least explained what it is that I'm reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Alex Posted June 6, 2019 Administrators Share Posted June 6, 2019 9 minutes ago, The0dark0one said: So are we not supposed to see these in our logs? I tried searching for this months ago and found nothing. I would love to have this fixed as well, or at the very least explained what it is that I'm reading. What's the effect that this is having on your connection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.