-
Posts
418 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Posts posted by Proud R3 Owner
-
-
So I don't know if this helps. I'm currently using it as laptop in device manager. When I select World of Warcraft in the list it tells me not to filter (which I don't anyway). This is what I get when in-game. Obviously I don't play in a windowed box like that but you get the idea. If there's anything else I can do to help out I'd be more than happy to.
-
When I log on to a character or in random dungeons or raids, I'm not seeing any servers on geofilter. I've also gone so far as to label my PC as an Xbox in devices and still no servers show up. On 3.3 beta with Geo set up in ping assist mode (small circle in the middle of the ocean).
-
4 hours ago, RouterUser said:
So, are you guys saying it's pretty impossible for me with my connection to be able to better my bufferbloat, then? Because I'm held down by the old copper wires of cable?
I have copper cable with Cox on their gigablast package (1Gb down 35Mb up). To get a good bufferbloat score I have my sliders set to 50% download and 35% upload. Other settings include priority set to gaming at 25, media and uncategorized set to 20, everything else is where it ends up. I also don't use geofilter but rather ping assist (tiny circle set in the middle of the ocean) with assist set to 40ms. I seem to get good results with where I'm at.
-
59 minutes ago, Mobel said:
That is normal because u are rebooting the router so it disconnects from WiFi, after the router is back online it reconnects to the WiFi and refresh the page
@Netduma Fraser I haven't tried that yet but I will when I'm home next.
@Mobel That makes sense but it's a bit confusing. I was expecting something like the web gui where when you reboot it tells you it'll take 3-4 minutes letting you know it's rebooting. The error message just looks like something went wrong with the reboot command (until you figure out you don't have Internet anymore).
-
Nothing to lose sleep over, @Netduma Fraser, but when using the app - settings then reboot I get this error screen. This comes after the confirmation pop-up. It does still reboot the router but I just thought you'd like to know. This is on Android 12 - App v3.3.28
-
46 minutes ago, Nuschler22 said:
Keep in mind first that playing on the Xbox Series X (XSX), when you select an older game, it starts some sort of Xbox 360 emulator as the old Xbox 360 start screen and music comes up. Also, it links to the traditional Xbox 360 home screen for invites and such.
Playing MW2 (2009) and older games, with any settings enabled on the router (QoS, geo, etc) the game has issues and won't connect most of the time. It not only won't find a game, but when the game starts on the XSX, it shows that I'm not even online on xbox live. Yet, when I go to the XSX home screen, I'm online and can play other games and navigate the store and xbox game pass. I had some success playing yesterday wirelessly, but obviously that isn't ideal. It still had numerous issues finding matches and would boot me from games.
If it does manage to show I'm on xbox live, I'm constantly getting a strict NAT even with port forwarding for the classic games, where I don't have that issue with the newer games.
Hence, only hooking from modem to console and bypassing the router eliminates (for the most part) those issues.
Hey I wonder if you set your Xbox IP static in the lan settings in reservation table, then set your Xbox as dmz in wan settings if you'd have the same issue. Wouldn't really be a fix but a possible workaround.
-
I'd first turn off your cable modem, plug in your laptop/PC directly to the modem, power the modem back on and once you get an IP and Internet on your device - try a speed test directly from the modem to your device. It'll definitely tell you whether it's your ISP or the router. If you're getting your full speed from your ISP during that test, turn off your modem and reconnect your router then power then both back on... Go into your router admin and turn off QoS and do another speed test. If you're getting your ISP speeds without QoS then adjust your sliders and maybe set congestion control to auto instead of always on. Also I'd set your max download and upload speed you got from your direct modem test to QoS settings. Can't really comment on the wifi radio issues though.
-
Aww that setup screen is way cooler looking than the one we got on the xr700
😕
-
I personally use sfp for my wan on the xr700 and have other routers in AP mode to distribute WiFi (ax11000 WiFi 6 and c5400x WiFi 5). Both setup with smart connect so it's kinda like a ghetto mesh but more expensive? I would totally buy a $700 beast router from netduma if they came out with something better than the xr700. C'mon boys, take my money!!! 😆
-
I've said this before and I still stand by it. I've tried many other routers in the interim waiting for an update to the 3.0 beta the xr700 was on for years. The reasons I stayed with the xr700 were the bulk raw power, sfp, and DumaOS. I don't use the wifi as and I don't use the integrated Plex server. Matter of fact, even routers with similar muscle just don't compare in features that DumaOS have. I think the xr700 as just a router is as close to perfect as I can find. Now that being said, if netduma can come up with a similar device with newer features and more frequent updates, I'm on board.
-
38 minutes ago, agent47isn1 said:
It's getting pretty close to a year or so when the xr500 got their beta. What about the xr450? Is it really that hard to have a beta for this hardware too? Where's the love? Is it none existent? Should I just give up and get a different gaming router that has better community support?
Hey xr700 owners had to wait since December 9th 2020 until July 24th 2023 for a new beta. Could be worse ya know. 🤷♂️
- crunkjuice1 and DARKNESS
-
2
-
1 hour ago, Fuzy said:
I think this has already been asked, duma side! the software being separated. But, I think Netgear won't deal with updates anymore... XR700 no longer built/marketed... (old router) Except maybe a security update, LoL!
Well that's why I'd like to see this beta as official, at least we can keep getting security updates on 3.3
-
Hey are you guys gonna submit this beta to NG for official release?
-
I personally use 50% download 95% upload.
-
I agree with some of this. The constant popping up of the tutorials does get a little old. Not a deal breaker for me though. I don't really use geofilter except for ping assist mode. Honestly I've tried other routers and get pings higher than what I'd like and suffer because of it (i.e getting shot behind a wall because in reality I'm not behind it). Now I'm getting servers less than 20 or 30ms. Now my kids and I don't worry about lag spikes or high latency servers. Only other thing I don't like is there's only 4 devices on geofilter. Trust me, adding and removing devices gets old too. But, this is what we do when we want good servers. It's not perfect, but it's as close as we'll get with having the amount of control we do with DumaOS.
-
I had thought about it after getting the Archer ax11000 and being disappointed a bit. I thought Asus might have done it a bit better. Honestly it came down to netduma. After having this much control and power on the xr700 I wasn't willing to go back to a similar gaming router that was watered down. If the xr700 would have had an 8 antenna configuration with tri-band that didn't give you a full useless band (802.11ad) and have mesh capabilities - it would have been the perfect router for the era it was released. I only use the xr700 as a router, the wifi is completely disabled on it. I have an older c5400x and the ax11000 both setup as hardwired APs with smart connect on and they cover my entire house and 1/4 acre yard with excellent signal.
-
No just 1 port to 1 switch. We have multiple wired TVs, consoles and PCs. I've got a wife and 4 kids with a rather large house. Matter of fact I use a c5400x and an ax11000 as APs - I don't even use the wifi on the xr700. We just have a lot of stuff to hardwire. We use wireless as well but only when we have to.
-
4-5 ports? Sounds more like a small switch bud. I have my house hardwired cat8 and have all 6 ports used going to gigabit switches on the xr700. I've used a lot of routers and to me the TP-Link Archer ax11000 and Asus ROG rapture gt-ax11000 got it right on a lot of levels. I honestly think with stronger hardware, a few more bells and whistles including DumaOS - you'd have a game changing router.
-
27 minutes ago, DARKNESS said:
@XR700 OwnerI’d agree till you said RGB it a waste of money realistically they should just focus on hardware…also I don’t think most users need 8 switches at that point but an external switch which they could in theory make as separate device just a thought if your one of those wire freaks
I mean honestly I'd take 8 lan ports with 2 able to trunk and if the sfp port was set to wan then the 2.5Gb port could switch to lan. Then they could come out with gaming smart switches that go with the DumaOS 4.0 with a 2.5Gb link port. That would kinda be baller imo. And RGB logo a waste of money??? Don't you know when you add RGB you automatically get higher speeds... Cuz you know... Science. Honestly I think the RGB logo would be nice as some people have their router incorporated with their gaming setup on the desk. That way it could add to the aesthetic of the whole concept people would go for. I'm not really like that personally but some are. Honestly if it didn't have that I wouldn't care. I stick with the xr700 purely for the unadulterated raw power it has and I think if NetDuma came out with something even more powerful cutting the Netgear bs out (cuz you know that's where most issues come from ie DHCP issues and getting official fw out) people would ditch the 700 and 1000 and move strictly to netduma.
-
15 minutes ago, Netduma Fraser said:
I mean a bug as in, given with the 700 it is possible you can reach higher than 1000Mbps and you're not able to adjust the max speeds above this
Oh sorry read that a bit wrong then. I retract that statement then about taking that bug, it should totally be fixed lol. 😆
I'm totally digging this new fw btw, I've drastically reduced ping in most games with the optimizer and setting geo for ping assist only.
-
35 minutes ago, Netduma Fraser said:
I will make a ticket for that as I would consider it a bug really.
That's great news, input 1000/1000 manually for your speeds though and double check on speedtest.net
Why would it be a bug if I can get 800Mbps download on a PC on lan with 350Mbps download from another PC on lan with QoS disabled and my ISP is giving me ~1200Mbps? I don't see anywhere near that with my QoS enabled as my sliders are set to 53/95 as per ping optimizer. I did get a -12ms in ping though which is what I'm after. Ping optimizer tests indicate I'm getting about 30ms without optimization. I've set my geofilter up in the middle of the ocean with ping assist at 40. I'm seeing game servers at 19-30ms now instead of ~50-70ms. If that's a bug, I'll take it. If I need max throughput I'll just disable QoS and I'll get all the bandwidth my ISP dishes out. I'd still like to utilize that extra 200Mbps with QoS enabled, but I'm not gonna stress about it.
-
R3 would be a beast - octacore, 2GB ram, 1GB flash, tri-band (not 801.11ad though WiFi 6 def), 8 detachable high gain antenna, smart connect/ mesh, zero wait dfs, airtime fairness, 8 port gigabit lan, 1 2.5Gb wan with an sfp port (also able to assign as wan). Slap some fans on the CPU/vrm and maybe have the feet longer with rubber bottoms and an exhaust fan pushing air out. Boom. DumaOS 4.0. MAYBE an RGB badge on the top.
You know you'd buy one.
- johnnytran and Nalsano_
-
1
-
1
-
1 hour ago, e38BimmerFN said:
Unfortunately my ISP doesn't have anything over 1Gb yet. I asked last week and the agent had no idea if the ISP was going to put something faster out. My ISP still hasn't put up support for IPv6 yet.
Sounds like someone gave some feedback though. In addition, I presume two or more devices should see same speeds if the SPF port was being used for the internet access. Though remember, all the RJ45 ports on the LAN side are 1Gb max. So you'll not see much over 900Mpbs there.
You won't see over 1Gbps over the rj45 wan or the lan ports. If your modem uses a 2.5Gb port and you're using sfp for your wan, then you'll see a combined throughput >1Gbps IF you're not using QoS. QoS can only use 1Gbps as a soft cap for some reason so if that's on that's your total throughput limit. Don't forget total throughput is shared over all the lan ports and wireless.
-
4 hours ago, Fuzy said:
Hi @e38BimmerFN
If you have a connection higher than Gbps... Could you check for me by placing the wan on the SFP+ port and performing 2 simultaneous tests on 2 different machines behind the XR700's integrated rj45 switch? Just to see if the flow is shared or if it can deliver more than one Gbps...
I've done that, with QoS off you can get over 1Gbps total throughput on 2 or more devices using separate lan ports. I'd really like to see the 1Gbps cap on QoS taken out so we can set our QoS speeds to what we actually get. I get closer to 1.2Gbps with my 8611 and sfp+ but since I like the QoS features I'll never see it.
World of Warcraft
in NETGEAR Nighthawk Support (XR range)
Posted
Well I don't really geofilter, I use ping assist mode so whatever server is ~30ms should auto connect wherever that server is located. I assume servers would be dedicated, I know Microsoft bought blizzard a little while ago so not really sure if world of warcraft is played on the Microsoft network now or still just using their original ones.