CRarsenxL Posted February 26, 2021 Share Posted February 26, 2021 Last night I reverted back to firmware 44_33 aka the first firmware that came with the xr. Although the interface is slow, the QoS is SIGNIFICANTLY better. Packets are being caught and more ratio is shown between download / upload. If Fraser and co need me to do some testing I can! I will show game play as well to display bullet reg! And I don’t die super fast. im wondering if there is udp packet loss since involving the apply to wan / normal default feature on the latest .52 FW. All users struggling, pls revert back, fac reset, give your console games console service and I guarantee it will feel significantly better than the .52 firmware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 26, 2021 Administrators Share Posted February 26, 2021 Thanks for the report. When you notice it prioritizing better on the original firmware, what settings is that compared to on the latest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VVarrior Posted February 27, 2021 Share Posted February 27, 2021 4 hours ago, CRarsenxL said: Last night I reverted back to firmware 44_33 aka the first firmware that came with the xr. Although the interface is slow, the QoS is SIGNIFICANTLY better. Packets are being caught and more ratio is shown between download / upload. If Fraser and co need me to do some testing I can! I will show game play as well to display bullet reg! And I don’t die super fast. im wondering if there is udp packet loss since involving the apply to wan / normal default feature on the latest .52 FW. All users struggling, pls revert back, fac reset, give your console games console service and I guarantee it will feel significantly better than the .52 firmware 3 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Thanks for the report. When you notice it prioritizing better on the original firmware, what settings is that compared to on the latest? I also did some testing looks like 44 stock firmware for xr1000 is more stable then the 52 firmware here are the buffer bloat on 44stock firmware on the xr1000 Now the 52 firmware on xr1000 i tested multiply times with the same percent values on Qos 44stock firmware looks to be more stable hopefully they fix it for the next update Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted February 27, 2021 Author Share Posted February 27, 2021 11 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Thanks for the report. When you notice it prioritizing better on the original firmware, what settings is that compared to on the latest? .33 -Games console = .52 Games console Normal(default) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 27, 2021 Administrators Share Posted February 27, 2021 Those results look as though the latest is better as the majority of the bars are lower than the original version. On the latest try using the apply to WAN option as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfie Posted February 27, 2021 Share Posted February 27, 2021 Thinkbroadband scales so the the first one is better where the latest had some spikes so it scaled it. Bit like PingPlotter scaling that scales as your latency increases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 27, 2021 Administrators Share Posted February 27, 2021 35 minutes ago, Newfie said: Thinkbroadband scales so the the first one is better where the latest had some spikes so it scaled it. Bit like PingPlotter scaling that scales as your latency increases. Seems a bit backwards but cheers! - Could you disable Traffic Prio entirely when doing those tests please as we have found it affects them in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted February 28, 2021 Author Share Posted February 28, 2021 12 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Those results look as though the latest is better as the majority of the bars are lower than the original version. On the latest try using the apply to WAN option as well. Newfie has said that’s WiFi WMM and has nothing to do w it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted February 28, 2021 Author Share Posted February 28, 2021 10 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Seems a bit backwards but cheers! - Could you disable Traffic Prio entirely when doing those tests please as we have found it affects them in the past. 12 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Those results look as though the latest is better as the majority of the bars are lower than the original version. On the latest try using the apply to WAN option as well. 12 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Those results look as though the latest is better as the majority of the bars are lower than the original version. On the latest try using the apply to WAN option as well. Fraser. Buffer bloat works better on the newest FW. But traffic prio doesn’t! It’s flipped lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VVarrior Posted February 28, 2021 Share Posted February 28, 2021 13 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Those results look as though the latest is better as the majority of the bars are lower than the original version. On the latest try using the apply to WAN option as well. i feel like i get melted faster on the new firmware 52 And 44 stock firmware i could get away a little more without insta dying in call of duty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted February 28, 2021 Author Share Posted February 28, 2021 19 minutes ago, VVarrior said: i feel like i get melted faster on the new firmware 52 And 44 stock firmware i could get away a little more without insta dying in call of duty 19 minutes ago, VVarrior said: i feel like i get melted faster on the new firmware 52 And 44 stock firmware i could get away a little more without insta dying in call of duty I was saying the same thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VVarrior Posted February 28, 2021 Share Posted February 28, 2021 1 hour ago, CRarsenxL said: I was saying the same thing i tried it 2day and yeah i was getting melted in warzone i swap back to 44 stock firmware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted February 28, 2021 Author Share Posted February 28, 2021 44 stock is better I think in general for consistency. I tried .52 and started great then went to shit fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brainbleach Posted February 28, 2021 Share Posted February 28, 2021 The amount of beta testing we have to do with these routers running Duma OS is totally absurd! The amount of money we spend on these underpowered routers, just to have to run beta firmwares or old firmwares is crazy. Duma OS 3.0 for the XR500 is STILL in beta. I recently switched to the Asus GT-AX11000 Wifi 6 gaming router and have never been happier. Stable firmware, amazing gaming features, and I can ACTUALLY use IPv6 and QoS AT THE SAME TIME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted February 28, 2021 Author Share Posted February 28, 2021 Just now, Brainbleach said: The amount of beta testing we have to do with these routers running Duma OS is totally absurd! The amount of money we spend on these underpowered routers, just to have to run beta firmwares or old firmwares is crazy. Duma OS 3.0 for the XR500 is STILL in beta. I recently switched to the Asus GT-AX11000 Wifi 6 gaming router and have never been happier. Stable firmware, amazing gaming features, and I can ACTUALLY use IPv6 and QoS AT THE SAME TIME. That the best ASUS router? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brainbleach Posted February 28, 2021 Share Posted February 28, 2021 1 minute ago, CRarsenxL said: That the best ASUS router? It was yes but the GT-AX11000E is coming out soon which is the same exact router but has access to the Wifi 6Ghz channels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfie Posted February 28, 2021 Share Posted February 28, 2021 3 hours ago, CRarsenxL said: 44 stock is better I think in general for consistency. I tried .52 and started great then went to shit fast Do you think it’s the servers rather than the router if that happens? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 28, 2021 Administrators Share Posted February 28, 2021 7 hours ago, CRarsenxL said: 44 stock is better I think in general for consistency. I tried .52 and started great then went to shit fast I don't think the changes that were made would affect the way it works - it just gives you more options to experiment with so try experimenting with prio and the options, if they don't work as well that is fine but there is no harm in doing so - Apply to WAN sends the priority tags to the ISP so not exclusively for WiFi devices - the other options are yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VVarrior Posted March 8, 2021 Share Posted March 8, 2021 On 2/28/2021 at 5:33 AM, Netduma Fraser said: I don't think the changes that were made would affect the way it works - it just gives you more options to experiment with so try experimenting with prio and the options, if they don't work as well that is fine but there is no harm in doing so - Apply to WAN sends the priority tags to the ISP so not exclusively for WiFi devices - the other options are yes. any news on the .53 on xr1000?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Netduma Liam Posted March 8, 2021 Share Posted March 8, 2021 16 hours ago, VVarrior said: any news on the .53 on xr1000?? We have been testing new firmware for the XR1000 recently, but we don't yet have an ETA as to when we will be able to release it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VVarrior Posted March 8, 2021 Share Posted March 8, 2021 3 hours ago, Netduma Liam said: We have been testing new firmware for the XR1000 recently, but we don't yet have an ETA as to when we will be able to release it. can i get a beta to test it and give some feedback? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Netduma Liam Posted March 9, 2021 Share Posted March 9, 2021 18 hours ago, VVarrior said: can i get a beta to test it and give some feedback? It's not something we are able to release for beta testing at the minute I'm afraid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.