iMoD1998 Posted January 12, 2021 Share Posted January 12, 2021 Hi, im just checking if the ethernet port bandwidth on the XR700 is shared across all the ports. (forgot the technical term) I'm currently using 10GB SFP+ for a NAS but two clients cant seem to maintain gigabit connections at the same time. I've made sure that IO isnt a problem. I just want to check if I may have misconfigured something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted January 12, 2021 Administrators Share Posted January 12, 2021 I believe you're talking about aggregation, you can find details about how to set it up etc on page 143 here: https://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/XR700/XR700_UM_EN.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundland Posted January 12, 2021 Share Posted January 12, 2021 35 minutes ago, iMoD1998 said: Hi, im just checking if the ethernet port bandwidth on the XR700 is shared across all the ports. (forgot the technical term) I'm currently using 10GB SFP+ for a NAS but two clients cant seem to maintain gigabit connections at the same time. I've made sure that IO isnt a problem. I just want to check if I may have misconfigured something. Yes I believe it is shared if memory serves me right but only up to a gig and then there will be the overheads which will lower the throughput a tad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMoD1998 Posted January 12, 2021 Author Share Posted January 12, 2021 8 minutes ago, Netduma Fraser said: I believe you're talking about aggregation, you can find details about how to set it up etc on page 143 here: https://www.downloads.netgear.com/files/GDC/XR700/XR700_UM_EN.pdf No im not, im talking about if each individual ethernet port is capable of 1Gb/s at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMoD1998 Posted January 14, 2021 Author Share Posted January 14, 2021 On 1/12/2021 at 9:20 PM, Newfie said: Yes I believe it is shared if memory serves me right but only up to a gig and then there will be the overheads which will lower the throughput a tad. Thanks for the info,. If I can get it working ill post the solution here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted January 15, 2021 Share Posted January 15, 2021 Is the xr1000 Ethernet bandwidth shared as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newfoundland Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 1 hour ago, fiefo said: Is the xr1000 Ethernet bandwidth shared as well? If you are asking if you have a 1 gig line into the router the answer is they will share that 1 gig and not have 1 gig throughput each if you had all the ports connected for obvious reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted January 16, 2021 Share Posted January 16, 2021 What port ranges do you suggest for the xr1000 ps5? For traffic prio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMoD1998 Posted January 17, 2021 Author Share Posted January 17, 2021 On 1/12/2021 at 9:20 PM, Newfie said: Yes I believe it is shared if memory serves me right but only up to a gig and then there will be the overheads which will lower the throughput a tad. @Netduma Fraser looks like bandwidth between ports are shared as far as I can tell which honestly has left me with no words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRarsenxL Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 So even the xr1000 shares equal bandwidth through Ethernet ports? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted January 17, 2021 Administrators Share Posted January 17, 2021 52 minutes ago, iMoD1998 said: @Netduma Fraser looks like bandwidth between ports are shared as far as I can tell which honestly has left me with no words. Thanks for the information, @altsai could you take a look at this and confirm whether this is expected behavior or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMoD1998 Posted January 19, 2021 Author Share Posted January 19, 2021 any news? @Netduma Fraser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted January 19, 2021 Administrators Share Posted January 19, 2021 10 hours ago, iMoD1998 said: any news? @Netduma Fraser It's unlikely he has seen it yet, I will email him now to take a look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMoD1998 Posted January 20, 2021 Author Share Posted January 20, 2021 @Netduma Fraser still nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted January 20, 2021 Administrators Share Posted January 20, 2021 @iMoD1998 they are really busy, they will not always be able to get back to us that fast. I have got a response via email: Quote The bandwidth is share and only 2Gbps between network process and 5-port external switch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMoD1998 Posted January 20, 2021 Author Share Posted January 20, 2021 @Netduma Fraser I understand everyone is busy but it was 3 days. Also that response doesn't make a lot of sense. Are they trying to say that 2gbps is maximum throughput of all the ports as a whole? In this scenario that isn't true. External switch? Network process? If so what was the point of advertising that the 10GB SFP+ port could be used for a NAS or even for a WAN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted January 20, 2021 Administrators Share Posted January 20, 2021 I've emailed them with your response and will get back to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMoD1998 Posted January 21, 2021 Author Share Posted January 21, 2021 So from what I can tell from online. Mainly from DDWRT is that the ports count as 1 actual port but netgear use VLANS to separate them meaning they all share the same bandwidth. However, I believe the 2 used for aggregation probably are separate ports otherwise it wouldn't do anything. If I'm right, this is a joke considering how its advertised that the 10Gb port can specifically be used for giving more bandwidth to the NAS which is just untrue if nothing can actually utilise it even as a WAN. Pathetic for a router that cost me £300+ I'd be re-evaluating the partnership with netgear because of this and all the crap they pull with just slapping DumaOS as a nice front end on their crap filled implementation. I mean seriously, it doesn't even have local DNS and fights Linux at every step despite running it. Shame I missed the return window. Hoping for a good recommendation for an actual 10Gb router because even if this is a bug, I doubt it will be fixed in my lifetime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted January 21, 2021 Administrators Share Posted January 21, 2021 I've chased him about this and regarding your new comments, will let you know when I have a clear answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted January 26, 2021 Administrators Share Posted January 26, 2021 I've received a response: Quote The BW between network processor (Annapurna AL314) and Qualcomm ethernet switch is 2Gbps; however, one is dedicated for WAN port and the other is for Qualcomm ethernet ports, which means all wired devices share 1Gbps to network processor. This is the limitation for such design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMoD1998 Posted January 27, 2021 Author Share Posted January 27, 2021 12 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: I've received a response: Thanks @Netduma Fraser. That's such a stupid design flaw. Welp. Netgear.........never again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.