Jump to content

CRarsenxL

Members
  • Content Count

    454
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Netduma Fraser in Xr1000 Advanced QoS?   
    I believe it can be done as it's been suggested before and I asked then. I couldn't say when/if that would happen - I know we do have some plans for QoS in general so it could potentially integrate well at that stage but its a way off yet.
  2. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Newfie in Xr1000 Advanced QoS?   
    I think this was were we chatted what we would like to see and one thing mentioned was the ability to add a different QoS like a piece of cake, FQ CoDel etc. Via a Rapp.
    I suppose it depends on the depth of the QoS in the system but it’s a nice suggestion but only Fraser or Liam could say if it was possible or could be implemented.
  3. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Netduma Fraser in Xr1000 randomly factory resetting itself   
    Do you try and access the router immediately after reboot? If so that may be why, I would recommend waiting 2 minutes before attempting to access, everything should have loaded up correctly by then.
  4. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Zippy in Applications in Categories   
    Interesting Fraser.. I have a question then on your above answer.. If say when playing a game like Halo5 and Network Monitor is showing it as unknown does that mean also that on the QoS page the game is unknown as well?  Does this have any effect on how the game performs? Being labeled as unknown?  You say you detect the traffic but why would a game like Halo not be at least added to gaming? Does Halo operate differently and make it difficult to add it to gaming?
    There are times when I do see Halo5 pop up as Skype in the NM.. strange thing there is when it does show this the game performs quite well.. When it doesnt show it or shows unknown it doesnt perform as well.. strange tbh why theres no consistency there..
    Thanks!
    Zippy.
  5. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Netduma Liam in XR 1000 Beta os   
    Unfortunately we don't know exactly which cores handle which tasks, that's a hardware question and we only make the software I'm afraid! What are the other cores running at? 
  6. Like
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from Netduma Liam in XR 1000 Beta os   
    Hey Fraser. The .54 FW you gave me felt great! Maybe NG cleaned up some of their FW??
     
    anyways, my next question to you would be CPU3. I heard packet acceleration On the NG forums which you said. Any confirmation on this? If it was a thing, how would it work? I see my CPU3 working like 1 to 1.5 to 2 sometimes but most of the time 0
  7. Like
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from TxFrog33 in XR1000 interface SLOW   
    Tbh the R2 performs better than the XR1000..... at least on console 
  8. Like
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from CypherzZ-_- in The qos is buggy needs worked on please   
    ^ def a bug. It’s been like that since .123 firmware
  9. Like
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from CypherzZ-_- in The qos is buggy needs worked on please   
    Known issue duma has an issue capturing some ps5 packets
  10. Like
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from CypherzZ-_- in The qos is buggy needs worked on please   
    I agree. The R2 is def the best rn ; I got the xr1000 as well and I think the NG firmware is too hefty on it atm which degrades the results. 
     
    Best bet : R2 —- AP XR1000
  11. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Netduma Fraser in XR1000 Issues   
    Sorry to hear that, we will have another update fairly soon I think and hopefully it will be more stable
  12. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Brainbleach in Attention all XR1000 users   
    The amount of beta testing we have to do with these routers running Duma OS is totally absurd!  The amount of money we spend on these underpowered routers, just to have to run beta firmwares or old firmwares is crazy.  Duma OS 3.0 for the XR500 is STILL in beta.  I recently switched to the Asus GT-AX11000 Wifi 6 gaming router and have never been happier.  Stable firmware, amazing gaming features, and I can ACTUALLY use IPv6 and QoS AT THE SAME TIME.  
  13. Like
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from VVarrior in Attention all XR1000 users   
    I was saying the same thing
  14. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Newfie in Wireless devices not obeying "Always" congestion control   
    https://www.netgear.com/support/product/xr1000.aspx#download
     
    theres 2 firmwares below the latest, you could try each one but you would need to reset after installing the firmware and there is security vulnerability If you do try them. 
  15. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to MaDDoX-03 in Let’s talk about the XR1000   
    Fraser those are the speeds when I allow the router to determine the speed from the modem (Setup Wizard). I have disabled Mu-Mimo at @CRarsenxL 's suggestion. I have also set sliders down to 40% and turned on Auto-Enable. 
  16. Like
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from MaDDoX-03 in Let’s talk about the XR1000   
    Xr1000 is a beast of hardware but the software features are just not up to par...hopefully it’s just because it’s a new release. Any fixes? Xr1000 is a new era of beast, don’t use old methods for a newer age! I believe in duma. I do
  17. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Zippy in Traffic Prioritization Question   
    Hey l2eactionz, as they say im doin doin! lol.. Hope things are well with you!
    From prior experiences ive always understood both to be important.. But I was seeing more download packets verses upload.. Maybe now something has changed where that is no longer true.. Im always open to listen to all possibilities and open to every ones point of view to help us all understand this..
    Heres the part that doesnt make sense to me.. When adding a Device to TP and proceed to play a game why does my download packets that are being prioritized show more then upload for about 4-5 games.. Then out of the clear blue all of a sudden my upload packets start to surpass my download packet count..? Thats playing the same game without making any changes in the router..   The packet count just starts to change from download being more to upload being more.. I just find that part very strange.. And its also kind of strange as this takes place the performance of the game becomes worse and worse.. So its this that makes me scratch my head trying to understand what is going on..
    So my conclusion the way im thinking is that at the very least the packet count for both up and down should be very close give or take a bit.. But mine seems to get a bigger gap then what I feel is correct..
    Are your packet counts close to each other or is your upload much more?
    Thanks!
    Zippy. 
  18. Thanks
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from Netduma Fraser in Lates firmware   
    I responded to your PM
  19. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Netduma Fraser in Lates firmware   
    They're still determining the DHCP issues using the XR500 at the moment. Do you have any issues with getting an Open NAT on multiple devices?
  20. Thanks
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from Netduma Fraser in XR1000 DEVICE MANAGER PS5   
    Yes I can. I’ll post screenshots if you’d like , I’ll use 5 minutes as a baseline and run the exact same startup and games 
  21. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Netduma Fraser in Lates firmware   
    @fiefo you're not having the issue so I'm commenting to @Coyote305
  22. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Coyote305 in Lates firmware   
    Please thank you
  23. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to BL4CK OPS V3TRN in Traffic Prioritization Question   
    Should you not just prioritise the ports the the game uses as shown in port forward.com 
    TCP.   3074
    UDP 88 - 500
    UDP. 3074-3075
    UDP 3455-4500
    So effectively 4 rules with the dest shown above all with the same source 1-65535  
     
  24. Thanks
    CRarsenxL got a reaction from nph84 in Mileage with Netgear XR1000   
    Not worth it yet. Unless they release stable fw soon
  25. Like
    CRarsenxL reacted to Netduma Fraser in Xr1000 congestion control bypassing?   
    Okay I'd set those back to defaults and then see if the speeds adhere more to QoS.
×
×
  • Create New...