Capoeira82 Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 6 day since last rebootย ๐ Good job guys! ๐๐ป๐๐ป๐๐ป๐๐ป Kris and Netduma Fraser 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_b Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 Took some doing to get the firmware to actually update but it finally did!ย I think the trick is to "Reboot" the router from the settings page, and then IMMEDIATELY after it's back online, upload the new firmware. I was hard rebooting, return to default settings, etc. but that was what finally worked.ย I have to say, I think I'm seeing quite a nice improvement. BF2042 hit registration seems a little more crispy and I'm seeing fewer "server issues" symbols pop up in game. So far that's the only game I've tried, but it does seem better overall.ย Netduma Fraser and exodus1337 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V1k1 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 On 2/10/2025 at 3:43 AM, dinego said: Hello, Netduma Team, I am experiencing some issues with my Netduma R3 and would appreciate your help in resolving them. Here are my main concerns: 1. Latency fluctuations and unstable ping Despite usingย Geo-Filter with Strict Mode enabledย and adjustingย Ping Optimizer, I am still experiencing noticeable latency fluctuations and occasional ping spikes. Theย Steady Ping featureย does not seem to be stabilizing the connection as expected. Same for me. I'm noticing slightly higher latency (compared to prior beta firmware) in waveform bufferbloat tests through various congestion control settings and running at various times in the day - seems to be more random and fluctuates. On prior beta firmware, it was 80% CC download for me that achieved consistent repeatable low latency in the bufferbloat test + having stable ping in valorant. Valorant shows spikes in the ping and jitter more than the prior beta firmware. It's not bad, but it's not as good as it was before. I'd love to have it more consistent for smoother gameplay and lower latency like before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White_Mamba Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 I am in the NW of the US and I have my own created filters that I've shaped around where I want. Ever since the last update and still through this update, I am still connecting to servers in Chicago, Illinois. Steady-ping and Geo-latency are off, ping-assist is at 0, strict mode is on, fast search is off. I've tried everything that I have read on here and on Google but it still happens. I really wish there was a way to filter-block areas that you don't want, like in my case, I wish I could draw a square around Illinois for a filter to block everything from that area no matter what.ย Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 13 Administrators Share Posted February 13 On 2/12/2025 at 1:24 AM, V1k1 said: Same for me. I'm noticing slightly higher latency (compared to prior beta firmware) in waveform bufferbloat tests through various congestion control settings and running at various times in the day - seems to be more random and fluctuates. On prior beta firmware, it was 80% CC download for me that achieved consistent repeatable low latency in the bufferbloat test + having stable ping in valorant. Valorant shows spikes in the ping and jitter more than the prior beta firmware. It's not bad, but it's not as good as it was before. I'd love to have it more consistent for smoother gameplay and lower latency like before. Once ACC is out you shouldn't need to worry about fine tuning this anymore, it should take care of it for you, the team is working hard on that currently 19 hours ago, White_Mamba said: I am in the NW of the US and I have my own created filters that I've shaped around where I want. Ever since the last update and still through this update, I am still connecting to servers in Chicago, Illinois. Steady-ping and Geo-latency are off, ping-assist is at 0, strict mode is on, fast search is off. I've tried everything that I have read on here and on Google but it still happens. I really wish there was a way to filter-block areas that you don't want, like in my case, I wish I could draw a square around Illinois for a filter to block everything from that area no matter what.ย You can do that with the Polygon mode essentially. Are you enabling the Geo-Filter when you're already on the game? Are you leaving your gaming device in an instant on/standby mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V1k1 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 1 hour ago, Netduma Fraser said: Once ACC is out you shouldn't need to worry about fine tuning this anymore, it should take care of it for you, the team is working hard on that currently Any betas for this? Or limited testers? Iโd be open to it if thereโs a chance. i do hope the base router is becoming stable overall so we donโt have to always rely on additional features/resources to fix it. Iโm still enjoying the router and canโt wait for the next beta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 13 Administrators Share Posted February 13 17 minutes ago, V1k1 said: Any betas for this? Or limited testers? Iโd be open to it if thereโs a chance. i do hope the base router is becoming stable overall so we donโt have to always rely on additional features/resources to fix it. Iโm still enjoying the router and canโt wait for the next beta. Not sure when it would be but we'll likely get it out to Early Access as soon as we're confident it's performing well V1k1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathRoll666 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Hi, I'm having a big issue with .540 update. I'm unable to connect with the WiFi using 5Ghz/160 Mhz connection. Firmware .290 works without an issue. Any solutions ? exodus1337 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 13 Administrators Share Posted February 13 1 hour ago, DeathRoll666 said: Hi, I'm having a big issue with .540 update. I'm unable to connect with the WiFi using 5Ghz/160 Mhz connection. Firmware .290 works without an issue. Any solutions ? Some devices don't like that band, is it on every device or older devices? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathRoll666 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 4 minutes ago, Netduma Fraser said: Some devices don't like that band, is it on every device or older devices? It's literally on every device. As I've mentioned .290 firmware with those settings 5Ghz/160Mhz works fine with every device.ย Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 13 Administrators Share Posted February 13 28 minutes ago, DeathRoll666 said: It's literally on every device. As I've mentioned .290 firmware with those settings 5Ghz/160Mhz works fine with every device.ย Change it then reboot it from the interface and then try again please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinego Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 On 2/10/2025 at 8:43 AM, dinego said: Hello, Netduma Team, I am experiencing some issues with my Netduma R3 and would appreciate your help in resolving them. Here are my main concerns: 1. Latency fluctuations and unstable ping Despite usingย Geo-Filter with Strict Mode enabledย and adjustingย Ping Optimizer, I am still experiencing noticeable latency fluctuations and occasional ping spikes. Theย Steady Ping featureย does not seem to be stabilizing the connection as expected. 2. PPPoE vs. DHCP connection issues I have two ISPs at home: Claro (DHCP)ย โ Works fine when configured directly on the Netduma. Vivo (PPPoE)ย โย The connection frequently drops after a period of use. I found that to use an ISP withย PPPoE, it must be set up viaย DMZ on the ISP modem, as Netdumaย does not handle PPPoE well directly. Are there any additional configurations recommended to stabilize the PPPoE connection via DMZ? 3. Errors found in logs I have noticed repeated warnings in my logs, such as: daemon.errย cli.lua[4274]:ย [WARNING]:ย ctย [random code]:ย timeย wentย backwards! This occurs multiple times and may be affecting performance. I also found logs indicating thatย HybridVPNย andย DHCPv6ย are active, even after attempting to disable them: daemon.warnย dhcp6c[PID]:ย T1ย expiredย daemon.warnย dhcp6c[PID]:ย T2ย expired Is there a way toย completely disable DHCPv6ย in the system? 4. Port Forwarding and Traffic Prioritization Issues I have manually configuredย port forwardingย based on recommendations forย Call of Duty (Black Ops 6)ย and also setย 1-65535 UDP/TCP in SmartBoost, but I am unsure if this could cause conflicts. Additionally, I have tried limiting bandwidth usingย Bandwidth Reservationย for gaming traffic, but I am not sure if the values I used are optimal. My Configuration: ISP:ย Claro (DHCP) / Vivo (PPPoE - via DMZ) Configured MTU:ย 1500 QoS Settings:ย Auto (Recommended) with 89% down / 85% up Geo-Filter:ย Only Brazil, Ping Assist 20-70ms UPnP:ย Disabled, using manual Port Forwarding Netduma R3 Firmware:ย Latest version (v4.0.540) HybridVPN:ย Disabled (but logs indicate it may still be running) My Questions: Do these log errors indicate a serious problem? Is there a way toย completely disable DHCPv6 and HybridVPN? Isย using port forwarding + 1-65535 UDP/TCP in SmartBoostย the best approach? Are there any other optimizations that could further stabilize my gaming connection? Are there any specific settings thatย could improve PPPoE stability via DMZ? I appreciate any assistance you can provide! ย On 2/10/2025 at 12:39 PM, Netduma Fraser said: @dinego Can you give us some of the stats you're seeing on this please? The team are aware and looking into it You can ignore those, it won't cause any issues Port Forwarding and Bandwidth reservation are completely different features, they won't cause conflicts. It won't be limiting, it's just reserving bandwidth. -- No they don't pose a problem You can disable IPv6 in WAN/LAN settings. If you don't have HybridVPN enabled it will be disabled.ย No reserving bandwidth won't do anything, gaming doesn't require much anyway. Prioritize it and have Congestion Control active. ^ No, it's something the team need to resolve ย I did it!ย ๐ช๐ After many attempts, I finally managed to establish a PPPoE connection and stay connected. For my case, being in Brazil and using VIVO as my ISP, I had to set the modem (Mitrastar) to Bridge mode through the advanced settings. Using the standard VIVO interface didnโt work. I also had to keep IPv6 WAN enabled because when it was disabled, the connection wouldnโt hold. I believe this was the reason for the disconnections, meaning that VIVO uses IPv6 for authentication. I tried disabling the VLAN on the ISP modem and enabling it on the Netduma R3, but it wouldnโt establish a connection. So I left VLAN enabled on the Mitrastar modem, and that worked. Another important point I noticed, @fraser, is that the VLAN setting on the R3 can only be activated during the initial setup. If it was previously configured without VLAN, it doesnโt allow changes. I had to factory reset the R3, enable VLAN, and even tried cloning the MAC, but nothing worked until I enabled IPv6 and proceeded with authentication. I've been connected for about 6 hours straight, and now I'll fine-tune the R3 to get the best results on Waveform. Today, I also purchased a static IP from my ISP to see if it improves the connection, and I ordered a Ubiquiti Nano G ONT to replace the ISPโs modem, which is very limited. ย ย Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzy Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 7 hours ago, dinego said: and I ordered a Ubiquiti Nano G ONT to replace the ISPโs modem, which is very limited. ย Your ISP allows you to bypass the ONT? It's not easy in France because it's not plug&play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinego Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 3 hours ago, Fuzy said: Your ISP allows you to bypass the ONT? It's not easy in France because it's not plug&play. Iโm not sure yet, but Iโll find out! Haha I know that to replace the ISP modem, you need the PPPoE credentials (username and password provided by the ISP), the VLAN ID used by the ISP (which can be found by accessing the ISP modem or calling them), and then configure PPPoE on the R3, enable VLAN on the R3, and check whether IPv6 WAN is required or not. I already have all this information, but it might be necessary to contact the ISP to request authorization for using a third-party ONT. I do know that some people here in Brazil have successfully made this switch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzy Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 14 minutes ago, dinego said: Iโm not sure yet, but Iโll find out! Haha I know that to replace the ISP modem, you need the PPPoE credentials (username and password provided by the ISP), the VLAN ID used by the ISP (which can be found by accessing the ISP modem or calling them), and then configure PPPoE on the R3, enable VLAN on the R3, and check whether IPv6 WAN is required or not. I already have all this information, but it might be necessary to contact the ISP to request authorization for using a third-party ONT. I do know that some people here in Brazil have successfully made this switch. Ok ! ๐ Keep us posted, I just wanted to make sure you're not wasting your money on hardware that can't do better than your ISP ONT or is too complicated to manage. If others have succeeded, why not if you have time to try, but the bypass in France is more of a copy of the ISP ONT than a simple DHCP option or a VlanID... ย Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 14 Administrators Share Posted February 14 14 hours ago, dinego said: I did it!ย ๐ช๐ After many attempts, I finally managed to establish a PPPoE connection and stay connected. For my case, being in Brazil and using VIVO as my ISP, I had to set the modem (Mitrastar) to Bridge mode through the advanced settings. Using the standard VIVO interface didnโt work. I also had to keep IPv6 WAN enabled because when it was disabled, the connection wouldnโt hold. I believe this was the reason for the disconnections, meaning that VIVO uses IPv6 for authentication. I tried disabling the VLAN on the ISP modem and enabling it on the Netduma R3, but it wouldnโt establish a connection. So I left VLAN enabled on the Mitrastar modem, and that worked. Another important point I noticed, @fraser, is that the VLAN setting on the R3 can only be activated during the initial setup. If it was previously configured without VLAN, it doesnโt allow changes. I had to factory reset the R3, enable VLAN, and even tried cloning the MAC, but nothing worked until I enabled IPv6 and proceeded with authentication. I've been connected for about 6 hours straight, and now I'll fine-tune the R3 to get the best results on Waveform. Today, I also purchased a static IP from my ISP to see if it improves the connection, and I ordered a Ubiquiti Nano G ONT to replace the ISPโs modem, which is very limited. Well done on getting it resolved and thanks for the update/solution! You should be allowed to change VLAN when on the main interface, what happens exactly when you try that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinego Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 5 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: Well done on getting it resolved and thanks for the update/solution! You should be allowed to change VLAN when on the main interface, what happens exactly when you try that? When I tried to change the VLAN in the main interface after the initial setup, the option was not available. It seems that VLAN settings can only be configured during the initial setup process on the R3. If the router has already been set up without VLAN, it does not allow changing it later. To apply VLAN settings, I had to factory reset the R3, then configure PPPoE with the correct credentials and enable VLAN (ID 10) during the initial setup. Trying to enable VLAN afterward didnโt work. Additionally, I had to leave VLAN enabled on the Mitrastar modem instead of configuring it on the R3, because when VLAN was disabled on the modem and enabled on the R3, the connection would not establish. Hope this helps! Let me know if you need more details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 14 Administrators Share Posted February 14 31 minutes ago, dinego said: When I tried to change the VLAN in the main interface after the initial setup, the option was not available. It seems that VLAN settings can only be configured during the initial setup process on the R3. If the router has already been set up without VLAN, it does not allow changing it later. To apply VLAN settings, I had to factory reset the R3, then configure PPPoE with the correct credentials and enable VLAN (ID 10) during the initial setup. Trying to enable VLAN afterward didnโt work. Additionally, I had to leave VLAN enabled on the Mitrastar modem instead of configuring it on the R3, because when VLAN was disabled on the modem and enabled on the R3, the connection would not establish. Hope this helps! Let me know if you need more details. VLAN is available in Settings > WAN > Advanced do you see it there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hmz Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Bonjour@Fraserje vois que l'optimiseur de ping ne fonctionne plus, je suis sur le nouveau firmware depuis sa sortie, j'avais rรฉussi ร appliquer une configuration optimale du rรฉseau selon ma propre connexion seulement depuis 3 jours plus rien n'est pareil, de la lenteur, duย fool sur l'ennemi , je gagne 1 duel sur 10 bref horrible, pensez-vous que cela est un rapport avec l'optimisateur de ping ? Car la je ne comprends pas pourquoi d'un plus rien de va. Merciย Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 14 Administrators Share Posted February 14 54 minutes ago, Hmz said: Bonjour @Fraser je vois que l'optimisateur de ping ne fonctionne plus, je suis sur le nouveau firmware depuis รงa sortie, j'avais rรฉussi ร appliquer une configuration optimal du netduma selon ma propre connexion seulement depuis 3 jours plus rien n'est pareil, de laย lenteur, une impression de fool sur l'ennemi et je parle mรชme pas des hits marker, horrible, pensez vous que cela est un rapport avec l'optimiseur de ping ? Car la je ne comprend pas pourquoi d'un plus rien de va. Merciย No it won't be related to that at all.ย What is the model of the modem/router the R3 is connected to and how have you set that to ensure all traffic flows to the R3? E.g R3 in its DMZ, modem/bridge mode Are ALL devices connected to the R3? What are the speeds you pay for/receive?ย Have you entered those speeds into the router? How have you setup Congestion Control? How have you setup SmartBOOST? What game are you playing? What platform are you playing on and how is it connected, via ethernet or WiFi? How have you setup the Geo-Filter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hmz Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 18 minutes ago, Netduma Fraser said: Non, cela n'aura aucun rapport avec cela.ย Quel est le modรจle du modem/routeur auquel le R3 est connectรฉ et comment l'avez-vous configurรฉ pour garantir que tout le trafic circule vers le R3 ? Par exemple, R3 dans sa DMZ, en mode modem/pont TOUS les appareils sont-ils connectรฉs au R3ย ? Quelles sont les vitesses pour lesquelles vous payez/recevez ?ย Avez-vous entrรฉ ces vitesses dans le routeur ? Comment avez-vous configurรฉ le contrรดle de congestion ? Comment avez-vous configurรฉ SmartBOOST ? ร quel jeu joues-tu ? Sur quelle plateforme jouez-vous et comment est-elle connectรฉe, via Ethernet ou WiFi ? Comment avez-vous configurรฉ le filtre gรฉographiqueย ? J'ai dรฉjร rรฉpondu ร ces questions la sur un autre sujet et depuis votre aide avec Fuzy tt aller mieux. Seulement depuis 3 joursย que l'optimisateur de ping estย Hors service est il possible que รงa soit la cause des problรจmes citรฉ plus haut, ( fool sur l'ennemi ect).ย Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 14 Administrators Share Posted February 14 18 minutes ago, Hmz said: J'ai dรฉjร rรฉpondu ร ces questions la sur un autre sujet et depuis votre aide avec Fuzy tt aller mieux. Seulement depuis 3 joursย que l'optimisateur de ping estย Hors service est il possible que รงa soit la cause des problรจmes citรฉ plus haut, ( fool sur l'ennemi ect).ย Ping Optimizer just changes the Congestion Control values which can be done manually so the only thing it would indicate is that you probably need to re-adjust those percentagesย Hmz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinego Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, Netduma Fraser said: A VLAN estรก disponรญvel em Configuraรงรตes > WAN > Advanced vocรช a vรช lรก? I can see the VLAN option. What I meant is that after setting up the R3 with VLAN disabled, I wasnโt able to activate it laterโit just wouldnโt save the change (VLAN enabled). ย I was only able to activate it after a factory reset and setting everything up from scratch. However, my ISP doesnโt allow the R3 to handle everything, meaning it canโt fully authenticate via PPPoE. ย At this moment, the issue is not with the R3 but with my ISPโs modem. ย Once my Ubiquiti ONT arrives, Iโll test it to see if I can make the R3 handle the full authentication process. ย ย Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Netduma Fraser Posted February 15 Administrators Share Posted February 15 7 hours ago, dinego said: I can see the VLAN option. What I meant is that after setting up the R3 with VLAN disabled, I wasnโt able to activate it laterโit just wouldnโt save the change (VLAN enabled). I was only able to activate it after a factory reset and setting everything up from scratch. However, my ISP doesnโt allow the R3 to handle everything, meaning it canโt fully authenticate via PPPoE. At this moment, the issue is not with the R3 but with my ISPโs modem. Once my Ubiquiti ONT arrives, Iโll test it to see if I can make the R3 handle the full authentication process. I know there was a firmware early on where it didn't save but that was resolved a while ago so should be fine now. Yes please then we can see if it has regressed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mytyurt Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 I am using R3 as a modem. Will there be a problem with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now