
CrossFitKila717
DumaOS Insiders-
Posts
313 -
Joined
About CrossFitKila717

Basic Info
-
DumaOS Routers Owned
Netduma R1
EE WiFi Enhancer
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Traffic Prioritization Settings: Modern Warefare (BO4)
CrossFitKila717 replied to East's topic in Call of Duty Support
So, you’re using 3074-45000 as source? I’m using 3074-3075 source, then 30000-45000 for destination (all UDP only). I’m on OG R1 firmware but not sure if that matters? -
Traffic Prioritization Settings: Modern Warefare (BO4)
CrossFitKila717 replied to East's topic in Call of Duty Support
Perfect, I’m going to start with the ports as this is one thing I’ve yet to try. -
Traffic Prioritization Settings: Modern Warefare (BO4)
CrossFitKila717 replied to East's topic in Call of Duty Support
On the OG firmware, I’m curious how just switching from reactive to preemptive would do? This in itself I think would take my 300/300 & tone it down. It’s a different algorithm so I wonder how that’d work since it’s designed for slower internet speeds. -
CrossFitKila717 started following N3CR0
-
I already have 200/10.....I’m stuck with that. I forgot to mention im getting full speeds (actually 210/11) when I have sliders on the duma set to 100. So, I feel as though I don’t need to upgrade as this seems capable. But just wanted to be certain since there may be hidden problems if it’s not “considered” compatible due to speeds.
- 354 replies
-
- intel puma
- jitter
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
The 7610 is not on the approved list for speeds of 200/10, which I currently have (it’s the lowest tier now unfortunately). It is on the approved list for speeds of up to 100/10.....I used it anyways because I wanted to see if it still worked since it’s a great modem & I didn’t want to use their supplied, free modem. “Seems” to be working fine but was a little weary since it’s not approved for my current speeds.
- 354 replies
-
- intel puma
- jitter
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
So I just saw this from previous post from ModBox.......so according to this, I should go with more channels???
- 354 replies
-
- intel puma
- jitter
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
So it’s a safe bet to look at the approved modems that Spectrum offers for my 200/10 speeds, & go with one of those as long as it’s not on the bad boy list? Assuming if they recommend it, it’ll be at least the 16x4 channel version for the speeds? Do I really need 24x4 or is 16x4 plenty?
- 354 replies
-
- intel puma
- jitter
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
So, I should go with at least a 16x4 or 24x4? Also, I should find out about docsis 3.1 versus 3.0? I’m running the ping test on the duma with my 7610 & it shows no packet loss, “excellent” on ping, “good” on jitter & spikes. Is it necessary to still upgrade if these all show good? Thanks!
- 354 replies
-
- intel puma
- jitter
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
The 7620 was one that we supposedly needed to stay away from.....I think it was on the bad list of modems because of that whole puma 6 chip issue. I have no idea about the docsis 3.1?
- 354 replies
-
- intel puma
- jitter
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with:
-
I just moved to TX & have Spectrum 200/10. I’m using my TP Link TC7610 which I know is a great modem.....but.....with the speeds of 200/10, spectrum doesn’t recommend this one. They recommend the 7620. My question is, should I go with a different modem since my 7610 is only an 8x4 channel, to match the higher speeds of 200/10? If I run the test on the Duma & it doesn’t show high spikes, ping or packet loss, shouldn’t it be ok, even though it’s not recommended with these speeds? I may try the freebie modem they gave me just to compare....I know they don’t have a great track record, but since I have it & its the recommended modem, why not? What are your thoughts?
- 354 replies
-
- intel puma
- jitter
-
(and 6 more)
Tagged with: