Jump to content

Your Opinion Please


RADDY1993

Recommended Posts

After many months testing different settings and software i have narrowed down to what i thing are the 3 best quality rendered video results for YouTube. Below are the 3 video clips using 3 different editing software and settings, if you have the time to view all 3 and say which you think looks best i can then do a written tutorial on how it was achieved, remember to watch in HD max setting. Thanx :)
 
 
Adobe Premiere 60FPS 

 

YouTube%20logo-128.gif

 

Debug Frame Server 60FPS 
 
YouTube%20logo-128.gif
 
Main Concept 60FPS 

 

YouTube%20logo-128.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was really tough to tell much of a difference between them.  I tested these at 1080p on a standard work computer monitor.  It is not color calibrated or a 4k or super high resolution monitor.  

 

FLOW:  All three seems to have the same fluid motion.  I could not tell a difference.

 

COLOR:  I stopped each of the 3 videos at several points throughout the video to look at different scene types (dark, very light, mix, different colors, etc).  I then compared all three videos with each stopped at the same points.  The Adobe seemed a slight bit lighter than the other two.  I liked the colors from the last two slightly more than the Adobe. The main concept has a slight edge for me. 

 

I believe that all three were good on a standard monitor.  If I had to pick just one, I would choose the Main Concept one.

 

Having seen all three, I would say choose the application that was the easiest and/or fastest to use. 

 

It will be interesting to see how others with higher resolution monitors compare them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was really tough to tell much of a difference between them.  I tested these at 1080p on a standard work computer monitor.  It is not color calibrated or a 4k or super high resolution monitor.  

 

FLOW:  All three seems to have the same fluid motion.  I could not tell a difference.

 

COLOR:  I stopped each of the 3 videos at several points throughout the video to look at different scene types (dark, very light, mix, different colors, etc).  I then compared all three videos with each stopped at the same points.  The Adobe seemed a slight bit lighter than the other two.  I liked the colors from the last two slightly more than the Adobe. The main concept has a slight edge for me. 

 

I believe that all three were good on a standard monitor.  If I had to pick just one, I would choose the Main Concept one.

 

Having seen all three, I would say choose the application that was the easiest and/or fastest to use. 

 

It will be interesting to see how others with higher resolution monitors compare them.

Great analysis :) i was thinking the last 2, the Debug Frame Server technique renders quicker. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

second one looked best for me, on the other two a couple of moments where it seemed it hadnt rendered properly ( like when BF4 doesn't load the textures at the start) 

Yes its due to the bitrate, thats why i uploaded them as 1440p so youtube gives a higher bitrate. The Debug one uses some 3rd party software and codecs to render the video in youtubes recommended encoding settings, you can see them HERE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yebs have had a look on 3 of them and I could not tell the difference to be honest. I had watch it on 2k screen of my ohone. If anything I would go with the 3 one just looked the most sharp and I personally like that the most sharp picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yebs have had a look on 3 of them and I could not tell the difference to be honest. I had watch it on 2k screen of my ohone. If anything I would go with the 3 one just looked the most sharp and I personally like that the most sharp picture.

Watch them in 1440p, i am liking the Debug Frame Server method which is a real quick render also. I capture in 1080p 60fps and render at 1440p 50mbps and its around 45 minutes which aint bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for some reason I cant open such High resolutions videos form youtube on my phone. Funny enough my phone its the only device I have with Higher resolution than 1080p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me really hard to tell the difference between the 3 but I guess there were differences but so so subtle.

 

But if I had to pick one of them it would be 2 but again subtle the difference to me was the contrast but again I'm not an expert just what my eyes saw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As another general comment, they all seem a bit darker.  A light increase in the brightness would be good.  That could also be my cheaper standard work monitor.

I hear you but i have tried higher brightness and it seems to wash out the blacks and you loose some detail. I am preparing to write out the tutorial for the second method as it renders quickest and matches YouTubes exact requirements for encoding, it takes a little time to set up but once configured the method is pretty straight forward. Do you guys have Sony Vegas Pro 13 ? as i have a easy tutorial on how to install and crack it but am not sure if the guys here will allow me to post the link to my YouTube video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...