Jump to content
Reminder, starting today you will no longer be able to login to the forum using your display name, to login you must now use your email address. ×

Another Moderated Nat in Warzone here...


Recommended Posts

Hey, guys have some idea about this? i tried lot of things but nothig i got it.

I had fiber and a router with ont integrated... i had ports open, dmz... and works perfect i got nat open in warzone.

i bought XR500 and a new separate ONT... I Conect ONT in mode bridge to WAN XR500 and PC To LAN and same, ports open, dmz... but i only got moderate nat ,same with geofiltering disabled... the tracert to my public ip shows only 1 jump so, i dont think its nothing about double nat.

i really appreciate any idea about what i should try, im done with this :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for help me bro! :), yes, The ont is a Ubiquiti fiber nano G. In wan settings nat is already open :(

I send some screenshots maybe you see something i dont see :)

Captura3.JPG

captura1.JPG

Captura2.JPG

Captura4.JPG

Captura6.JPG

Captura5.JPG

captura7.JPG

Captura8.JPG

Captura9.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Okay so you're using a lot of port options to try and get an open NAT which could be causing conflicts. Remove the DMZ and port forwarding rules, leave UPnP enabled and NAT set to Open, does that work? 

As you're getting a public IP through the router there is no routing above you, possible you have a CG NAT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes i tried all combinations with dmz without dmz with upnp without upnp etc, i tried now exactly as you say and got moderated again(upnp detects port with game open, but not really open it).

I dont think its CG NAT cause if im right mi public ip should be diferent as my dchp, i check and its the same.

I´m really done with this, i dont know what is happening :(

Captura10.JPG

Captura11.JPG

Captura12.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Ubiquiti has an interface, by default on 192.168.1.1 when i conect directly to pc y joined and change to 192.168.100.1 and set the ont in bridge mode. In first moment i thought had diferents ips could be get a double nat, but Ubiquiti has set in bridge mode not router... and tracert to mi ip only get 1 jump so i dont think that was a trouble.

Captura13.JPG

Captura14.JPG

Captura15.JPG

Captura16.JPG

Captura17.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, bridge mode was by default, i just only change the ip to 192.168.100.1 ... could be works if i change the ip to another same as router could work? (for example: 192.168.1.2?), maybe its stupid what i say but i dont have any other idea , have you something better to try? 😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Rad said:

No, bridge mode was by default, i just only change the ip to 192.168.100.1 ... could be works if i change the ip to another same as router could work? (for example: 192.168.1.2?), maybe its stupid what i say but i dont have any other idea , have you something better to try? 😅

Are you able to disable bridge mode and instead DMZ the XR's WAN IP? Changing the ONTs IP wouldn't make I difference I don't think, though you're welcome to give it a go anyway!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ohhh sure i could try, i dont see dmz in config of ubitiqui, i see upnp, what lan ips should i configure to this test?, if i take 192.168.100.x this will be diferent as xr500, if i take 192.168.1.x then xr will not get dchp right?

Captura18.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having looked it up, there doesn't appear to be a specific DMZ function with the Ubiquiti just yet, so this plan isn't going to work. Let's go back to bridge mode.

Could you then go back to the XR500 and setup a port forwarding rule for the following:

Source: 3074 - 27050

Dest: 3074 - 27050

TCP & UDP

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as i did in screenshot?, i did that...with dmz, without dmz, with upnp, without upnp, with upnp and dmz and without upnp and dmz, all cases got "nat moderate"... i conected only old router+ont(livebox fiber) isp again to see if something has change on my computer... but no, i got open nat with it... so the problem have to be in ubquiti or xr500, any idea?

Captura19.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i did another test, i tried to put ubiquiti in router mode like screenshot, as router, its not good but id like to try it what nat i got it... and... got modereate nat too, it suposse bridge mode should not be the same but... im not sure what to think... 🤔

Captura20.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG i got it!!!, the trouble was in windows, he was putting all new lans automatic private... and old lan was config in public... i just only change private to publicand got open nat... how i can be so stupid... so sorry i didn´t thought in that :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Rad said:

OMG i got it!!!, the trouble was in windows, he was putting all new lans automatic private... and old lan was config in public... i just only change private to publicand got open nat... how i can be so stupid... so sorry i didn´t thought in that :(

Good work! I didn't think of it either so no need to apologise! Let us know if you need anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Netduma Liam said:

Good work! I didn't think of it either so no need to apologise! Let us know if you need anything else.

I just Really thank you for you and Fraser for your help and support, i´m finishing to configure and testing dumaos and its awesome, geofilter works perfctly, and have lot of options easty to config... i read too that you are working hard to improbe the ping heatmap system really thank for all this work to all of u. :D

Theres is only one thing im not getting a good result and its ping with charge. you know what should i change to get some better results? thankss :)

Captura22.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the support! We really appreciate it.

That looks like you could do with optimising QoS a little more, perhaps try lowering the sliders in Congestion Control 5% at a time and perform a connection benchmark after each test, see if this improves this score at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ohh, cool!!!! ill wait to new update to try again :D

I have last question, i have voip on my isp, i cant get SIP code (the isp dont tell me and, untill i know, it cant be take out from router of the isp). there is any chance to conect router of isp in lan of the XR500 to continue having phone on VoIP mode?, if it is , how i should config it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Yes you should be able to connect the ISP router behind the XR - if it is just for VOIP then you probably don't need to configure any specific way. Meanwhile toggle SIP ALG in the XR500 WAN Settings and see if that helps with VOIP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ohhh, im getting some troubles with that...

I conect isp router lan to lan like this: ONT -> WAN to XR500 -> LAN to ISP Router  .... i got device unknow and i see disconected... i tried to put manually dchp and configure an ip with same range (192.168.1.50) and i got a partially recognice... if i go in lan add ip static i see LIVEBOXFIBRA (name or the ISP router and right ip 192.168.1.50) but in red map i see 1 minute conected and change to 1 min. disconected.... 1 min. conected... 1 min. disconeted... and again and again... seems like ISP Router restart but he doesnt (lights dont go off)... i tried to mark and unmark SIP ALG In wan settings but nothing change. The light of Line in ISP router i never get on... i never did something like this, and i dont see too much information on internet... probably was a stupid thing but have no idea what is failing, i send screens about it, what u think i should try?

Captura26.JPG

Captura27.JPG

Captura28.JPG

Captura29.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...