BL4CK OPS V3TRN Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Hi All My bandwidth in anti flood shows 4.8 down and 1 up ( mbits ) I have tried to change this but nothing saves , my fiber speed is 80/20 wired . Can somebody help me , also why does it shoiw in Mbits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Netduma_Iain Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Sure I can help Please do the following. Select "Congestion Control", at the top in the "Anti-Flood" section click "Set Bandwidth". Then you can fill in the entries there and click "Update Bandwidth." If that doesn't work please let me know what device and web browser you are using. Thanks Btw once you do get it working make sure to choose reactive algorithm not pre-emptive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BL4CK OPS V3TRN Posted December 31, 2014 Author Share Posted December 31, 2014 Hi Iain Tried that on both the Laptop and Ipad . Both using Google chrome , still does not hold any changes Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BL4CK OPS V3TRN Posted December 31, 2014 Author Share Posted December 31, 2014 sorted now - i was inputting 70000 and 18000 rather than 70 and 18 duh !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abc123 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 sorted now - i was inputting 70000 and 18000 rather than 70 and 18 duh !! glad you fixed it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukasz Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Hm why reactive over pre emptive my is virgin uk 106 d 6 u imay be mistaking bot it seems pr empive works better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Netduma_Iain Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 Preemptive is more processing intensive so unfortunately it can't handle speeds above around 60mbits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukasz Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 Preemptive is more processing intensive so unfortunately it can't handle speeds above around 60mbitsok i will try reactive today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukasz Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 Preemptive is more processing intensive so unfortunately it can't handle speeds above around 60mbitsyebs my down load is 100 so its above range of preemptive bot my upload is in range of it so i am confused whitch should i refer to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Netduma Luke Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 yebs my down load is 100 so its above range of preemptive bot my upload is in range of it so i am confused whitch should i refer to We recommend you use reactive as your download will be restricted if you use preemptive. Hope that helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukasz Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 We recommend you use reactive as your download will be restricted if you use preemptive. Hope that helps. shure bot before r1 i woes using my full net speed and many times i woes in disadvantage due to lag compensation system so i woes using trothling my net to slower speeds and 7 out of 10 games that woes evening things out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Netduma Luke Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 shure bot before r1 i woes using my full net speed and many times i woes in disadvantage due to lag compensation system so i woes using trothling my net to slower speeds and 7 out of 10 games that woes evening things out Throttling it to achieve lower speeds for lag compensation is an almighty can of worms that I am going to steer clear of. However I will say that anti-flood is designed purely to eliminate congestion on your network and that is all we would recommend it is used for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukasz Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 Throttling it to achieve lower speeds for lag compensation is an almighty can of worms that I am going to steer clear of. However I will say that anti-flood is designed purely to eliminate congestion on your network and that is all we would recommend it is used for.can you explain why throtlling is a bad thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Netduma Luke Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 can you explain why throtlling is a bad thing I'm not going to pass comment on whether it is a good or a bad thing as it's such a can of worms. I do recommend thought that Anti-flood is used for congestion control as that is its purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abc123 Posted January 1, 2015 Share Posted January 1, 2015 can you explain why throtlling is a bad thing Well there are two sides to this argument. 1st Side: QoS or Congestion Control (netduma): Using this normally causes some additional router processing and lowers the maximum speed available to any one user. Meaning if no one is doing anything and I download on a direct wired connection I won't reach my connections maximum speed. However, it works really well when you have a wife or kids that don't understand that opening 6 youtube videos at the same time takes a lot of bandwidth. 2nd Side: You can normally on a client per client limit the programs that would MAX out your internet (torrents, UseNet, etc) this is true for almost everything and thereby is the preferred method when you have a tech savvy household. However, if they use Youtube or Netflix or Hulu....well you are out of luck and might lag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lukasz Posted January 2, 2015 Share Posted January 2, 2015 Hm nice info my net is 100 up 6 down and its used for my girlfriend phone my phone one pc watching youtube and some http my consol and pc. Runing netduma Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.