R4 potential improvements

[18RayF]

Increased Ram higher speed  , quad core higher speed CPU , FPGA based packet processing , Neural processing unit , predictive congestion control , Geo filter improvements that you don’t connect to any servers outside of a ping range etc as it doesn’t totally work despite denying all servers in a region , DNS unbound , Adblock , Latenxy aware routing an hardware acceleration 

[Agner]

Mas fácil voce comprar o udm pro Max. Vc vai ter quad core 2.2 8gb memória ham. De vez de pedir outro roteador nessa config

[Netduma Fraser]

Just a small list of things you want then! A router doesn't need a neural processing unit, the hardware is important to a point but there is a point where you're just adding to it unnecessarily which will have no extra benefits and will just raise the price.

[18RayF]

Yes that’s true but a CPU has cycles to inspect and forward packets etc a NPU has parallel pipelines to process in nano seconds vs microseconds preventing spikes when loaded  , also provides advanced security with barely any latency compared to a CPU . if added it will be beneficial but if you guys can’t it’s fine I’m only listing what I thjnk can have a big enough difference 

[18RayF]

I believe adding a NPU would bring the biggest performance for the cost vs making any other hardware changes , other things I listed are probably overkill .

but it would be worth testing a NPU  also unless the next upcoming Model that is released provides a lot more improvement , most people wouldn’t upgrade from a R3 to R4

[Netduma Fraser]

"most people wouldn’t upgrade from a R3 to R4" what are you basing that on without an R4 being announced and with no details on what it could be?

[18RayF]

As in typically even in GPU for Pc most people don’t upgrade every gen unless massive improvements for example 20-30 series had biggest improvement and 30-40 and 50-60 series  raw performance isn’t a lot more .

obviously time between the router models are longer as we see when the Duma R3 was released vs R2. So when we have a R4 released if the improvement is 10% vs R3 most people wouldn’t see a point to upgrade for  whereas if the improvement is a lot higher around 40% or more many people will purchase due to the price to performance also despite being more expensive than. A R3 Hope it makes sense 

[Agner]

O r3 é específico para jogos a ideia é boa, se você rodando 100% funcional sem bugs a ideia é o hardware para está proposto é mas que suficiente. Antes de pensar em r4, fico pensando em firmware sólido sem bugs e com proposta correta para que serve.