Shane Posted June 20, 2016 Posted June 20, 2016 Hey, I have slow speeds (Like 4MB slow ) I have the option to get Virgin Fibre Optic but they're jitter and ping spikes is crazy whereas my slow BT connection is stable. I recently seen someone say that for speeds like mine Preemptive is the best algorithm. I currently have mine on Reactive. Why should I use Preemptive? What's the difference? Thanks
Zennon Posted June 20, 2016 Posted June 20, 2016 How I tested when I had 6Mb as I tested when I moved to fibre is... Run ping plotter while you run a speedtest from speedtest.net this will saturate your bandwidth up and down stream while switch from preemtive and reactive at 70% CC each way. This will show you the better of the two at keeping pings low while there is traffic on you network. For me it was reactive for both lines at around 2ms jitter when saturated.
Shane Posted June 20, 2016 Author Posted June 20, 2016 How I tested when I had 6Mb as I tested when I moved to fibre is... Run ping plotter while you run a speedtest from speedtest.net this will saturate your bandwidth up and down stream while switch from preemtive and reactive at 70% CC each way. This will show you the better of the two at keeping pings low while there is traffic on you network. For me it was reactive for both lines at around 2ms jitter when saturated. I'll give that a blast after work tonight cheers Zennon What's the difference between the two?
Zennon Posted June 20, 2016 Posted June 20, 2016 Preemtive is a Netduma exclusive algorithm and reactive uses sq_codel Its very line dependent it seems on which works best.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.