II Z IE IR O II Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 I currently have a 100/5 Mbps connection. I understand that if I want to achieve the true 100Mbps throughput thru the router, I need to set the R1 to "Reactive" in the congestion control section of the R1. My question is: Is Preemptive better at controlling "ping spikes" vs Reactive settings? I don't care about bandwidth, I care about ping spikes more.
Netduma Staff Netduma Crossy Posted April 3, 2015 Netduma Staff Posted April 3, 2015 I currently have a 100/5 Mbps connection. I understand that if I want to achieve the true 100Mbps throughput thru the router, I need to set the R1 to "Reactive" in the congestion control section of the R1. My question is: Is Preemptive better at controlling "ping spikes" vs Reactive settings? I don't care about bandwidth, I care about ping spikes more. Well I think Preemptive is a smoother algorithm. I'm not sure if it is better at controlling ping spikes, but I think its meant to be a better algorithm overall - it just can't handle the higher speeds. I don't think it would affect ping spikes (can't say for sure though), but if you really don't care about bandwidth, imo Preemptive is a better algorithm I prefer preemptive.
Guest Netduma_Iain Posted April 3, 2015 Posted April 3, 2015 Premeptive should handle ping spikes caused by others much better mate. I'll look into jitter analysis soon!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.