Dc38

I am using Armor. For the browser, i use a few different ones. Firefox, Chrome, Edge, Brave...i only use the router based adblocker. I checked the settings, and do not have "force sites to use https" turned on.

Both options gave me that particular error code. I rebooted the router a few times and the issue went away. I tested with another factory reset, and it defaulted me to California again, with the same RPC error, and again a few reboots made it go away.

Hi all, I noticed that my geofilter defaults to California even though I'm on the east coast of the US. When I try to manually change the location, it gives me the following error: RPC error 'ERROR_CMDFAIL': Exec '//usr/bin/geoip -f /tmp/geoip_ipc2 -h -a "41" -l "-73"' failed with 1 I'm not sure what needs to be done, as i have recently factory reset. I've tried reloading the latest firmware as well followed by a factory reset, to no avail. It keeps defaulting me to California even though the NTP server is properly set to Eastern. Thanks in advance for any help!

[DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 39042 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 54528 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 59698 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 56398 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 36232 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 34070 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 42722 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 47794 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 45762 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 42518 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 50572 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 48516 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 57242 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 60652 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:51 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 57512 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 43132 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 53432 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 58624 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 44138 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 37070 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 45798 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 58680 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 55224 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 [DoS attack: TCP SYN Flood] from source 89.248.165.38,port 45070 Sunday, Jul 24,2022 01:13:50 The logs go on quite extensively and as mentioned above, it happens especially frequently in Division 2. (Yes, it was at 1ish in the morning lol)

Hi all, QOS at 90/90 is still the best setting. According to the ping plotter, spikes above 200ms happen nearly simultaneously on all middle points of the route at set intervals except the first and last ones. I'm assuming that there really is something wrong with the ISP nodes or game servers switching routes every 20s or so. I'll run the plot again and get a screengrab next time. Thanks again for the help! On a side note, when the ping spikes happen, the router is getting hammered by a certain IP block especially when I play Division 2, it seems that I get every single port scanned or flooded. Arin shows the IP belonging to "Recyber Project", is there a way on Duma to filter that IP block and try to reduce the impact of the attack?

Thank you, I'll try that for now and update with results.

The best results seem to be 90/90, but with QOS on the DL is typically from 5 to 15ms higher than with it off while UL remains almost the same. Also, after I turned QOS on to enable the traffic Prio, the target device and service are prioritizing packets even though the device isn't even on lol...how does that work? Below is with the QOS set to my most optimal settings, 90/90, as you can see with loaded ping, the DL ping is almost 3x the UL ping...not sure how or why it's so relatively high And another test

Sorry for the late reply. I recently rebooted the router again and haven't used the QOS since, so no packets have been prioritized. I can turn it back on and check later today and report back then. As for the ping stability, i used the GFN test, as they claim it is pinging their GFN servers and not a generic speed test host. Also, as for the 20's DL ping vs the sub 10's upload ping issue, that is on any generic speed test as well as the built in DumaOS "Connection Benchmark". Although the values are still relatively low, I don't know why the DL ping is roughly 3x the UL ping in general. The one above is QOS off The one below is QOS on As you can see, the ping test is lower with QOS on, but the loaded DL values are relatively high. Normally the DLping is in the mid 20's.

Hi Liam, I have Geforce now on the pc I'm playing on set as priority traffic, and I AM seeing logged packets in that menu. Even the quick test in GFN shows I have an excess of bandwidth, as well as 0 packet loss, no jitter, and 7 ping. However, the connection isn't quite as stable as one would expect it to be with all the qos turned on...I did happen to reboot the router last night, and it definitely helped the spotty performance for an hour or so. I do NOT have netgear armor activated, do you know if it would help substantially if it were to be activated? Also, is it normal for the download ping to be in the 20's to 30's while the upload ping is 4 to 7?

I have tried it both, swapping it up for each session I play, and I'm speculating, but it sure feels either the firmware/hardware is not up to the task lol...it seems to be adding JUST enough latency that leaving the qos completely off (no antibloat no prio settings) seems to work slightly better for upload/hit reg. Whatever way though, as soon as other devices either ping on, I hit HUGE lagspikes up the order of hundreds...i have all of my devices in a reserved IP list, with a separate DHCP pool for new/random stuff. On a side note, does the QOS treat wifi traffic the same as ethernet? And how should a device using GeforceNOW be prioritized? (I noticed that it seems to like bumping up the priority for "uncategorized")

I'm currently afk, but I'm on Gb fiber with my qos sliders are set to 50%DL 75%UL, Allocations set to even levels for applications. I'm on a desktop playing anything from Division 2 to CS and Apex.

Hi again, sorry for the late replies again...please see link for reference https://wikidevi.wi-cat.ru/Broadcom/SoC, use the "find on page" feature to find the chipset used in the xr1000, BCM6750, and under the Esystems column it says 10 devices. From my personal use, if I have some video on the TV, an Ipad, 2 phones, and a laptop running as well as a couple wifi cams streaming, I will hit lag stutters in the game when those wifi cams ping on with motion detection.

Thanks for all the assistance, the latest couple firmwares seem to have fixed the issue! On an unrelated note, I read somewhere that the chipset works best when the total concurrent connected devices does not exceed 11, and QOS works best with 6 or less concurrent devices.

I am still limited to 8 devices for some reason...

I'll try removing the offline devices and let you know the results.

I am going into the settings tab, then accessing LAN setup within the Setup sub menu. I am adding devices off of the "Add" submenu, then clicking apply.

I have been making the changes on a PC, the mobile browser screenshots were just for the sake of convenience.

I have a couple tvs, which I have matched assigned IP's to the reservation list, and a few tablets/phones and thermostats. I'm not sure where to check for randomized MAC addresses.

On a side note, i limited the dhcp pool range between 1.2 and 1.25, and per recommendation assigned reserved IP's beyond that range. I was able to add one more ip reservation for a grand total of 8, but I'm still having issues where any entry past the latest will overwrite the immediate prior entry...

Within the home, it's devices to XR1000, to bridge ONT, straight to the utility pole and beyond. As far as external ISP based devices, I do not know.

On an average day it's 840/920 down and up, using the connection bench with congestion control with anything above 65% each gives me consistently high ping spikes, jitter, and bufferbloat averaging 40ms. The bench scores from these configs will usually be A+ A+ B. Using the bench while congestion is set to 20% each results in the most stable benchmark for me; 10ms average with the outlier spike ranging from anywhere between 40ms to 100ms. These benches will result in A+ A+ A+. Anything below 60% congestion sliders will result in A+ across the board, but the bufferbloat graph will have spikes that look like wifi pulses for idle, upload, and download. Also, the results above are with "shared excess bandwidth" all disabled, as the sharing seemed to consistently result in higher ping. Any idea what would cause the bufferbloat graph to pulse like that? The top image is sliders at 100%, B bufferbloat. The images below are, respectively: sliders at 65%, and sliders at 20%. The bottom most image is 65% with shared excess enabled.

Hi Liam, I'll give that a shot. As far as the QOS setup goes, the image of the settings has given me the most stable tests, but there are still substantial lag spikes in game when the devices connect.

Hi all, When trying to set IP reserves on my LAN on an XR1000 running firmware 1.0.0.52_1.0.38, any device entry over #7 wipes and replaces the current #7. Is the reserved IP table limited to 7 entries? Furthermore, I have 13 devices that connect intermittently when in use throughout the day, but they seem to be causing lagspikes in games for other devices that are currently connected, which is why I am trying to reserve IP's to avoid the random assignment per session per device. Would appreciate any assistance, especially with diagnosing the ping spikes that seem to happen when the other devices connect.