druski

I've used this and my ping is pretty stable. The one thing I've noticed when using waveform, which you can see in the screenshot, are those super high max latencies. I've yet to see those on the ping-plotter, and I could only imagine would be responsible for the high jitter/+ms when testing. Are those "anomalies", or is this something that can be targeted? They don't happen every single time, but the do appear often when testing.

I dont think the original CB posted. Here it is.

I've been playing with the CC dials, and have finally managed to get my grade to an A-A+ on waveform. However, when I test in the CB for xr1000, my underload latencies are about 20-30ms on average, peaking into the 35-60ms on occasion, with a 17ms idle. Waveform put me at around +4 to +7ms for both Up and Down. I have been able to tune the CC to have my underload on CB within +1-5ms with 17ms idle, but when on waveform, I lose the low ms spiking to about +10-20ms. I wanted to know which test a more reliable/accurate representation of what my underload latency actually is. I followed a thread in one of the R3 discussions when it came to bettering hit registration in COD, and everyone in there was using waveform as their representation for "good reg." Just wanted to know if there really any difference, or if one really does matter when trying to accommodate to my situation (that being bettering reg).