munteanadrian88

Often people who don't know software testing inside out don't grasp that you can't just change a line of code, test it and then release the product. I remember a one line bug that was fixed but an intel development team. It was an easy fix. They tested the change but ignored the "golden rule" in the book of software testing and released the product. The change they made had a knock on effect and caused a fatal bug in a completely separate piece of code. It was hundreds to one against, but it happened. The worst part was that it only became apparent months later after it had caused millions of dollars of damage to projects all over the world. intel's reputation was badly damaged, the product destroyed. intel sacked the entire development team. I have no clue who you were referring to by mentioning those nice words from the above: "Often people who don't know software testing inside out don't grasp that you can't just change a line of code..." Maybe not all the people in this thread could be classified as "really don't know anything abut software testing..." I personally work since 2014 in software testing and gathered a lot of experience over the years from that (so please be nice when addressing to the public) NO one says change a line of code and that will fix all the issues in the firmware All in all, nice story about the fatal bug The golden rule is - when a product is tested, don't just test what you think you need to test - test it all! That's why it's so slow to test even a simple change. And it's best to save a number of fixes up to justify the time spent testing. All in all, it just takes far more time than you would think. Go tell your boss you will need more time that he can imagine and see what happens That's why you have to obey another golden rule in order to test SMARTER not HARDER. GO GO test automation!

at least 7 minutes between them yes, one more reboot:)

Strange things happening after several reboots today...?! Looks like one of the reboots did not finish/execute/perform properly for some reason...?! Can't wait to put a hand on the next firmware release greater than XR1000 1.0.0.64_1.0.49 (including DumaOS 3.2) and hopefully will be a better one:) I have no control over the router when the reboot is taking place and logs are empty right after.

Hello Fraser, I have tried the scenario described by you above plenty of times and but I still get connected to those servers I have denied previously. See the snapshot below: Best Regards, Adrian M.

This Report button has never worked for me. See the snapshot below:

I've got this error right after logging in into the interface: It shouldn't matter, you should still be able to click Deny and you won't get matched with that server again. Is that not the case for you? No is not, see the snapshot below:

Yes, but the problem is that you cannot reject a bad connection anymore since you still get matched up with that peer which is awful. Is there a way to get rid of this without re-installing the firmware? I tried to re-sync the cloud under each of views which supports it, and the map still shows the servers as peers. I need that DumaOS 3.2 but Netgear are not releasing it for some reasons...

Hello Liam, Fraser, Why does DumaOS connects to Peers instead of Dedicated Servers sometimes? Expected Europe Central (Frankfurt): I have tried both Polygon and Radius modes and nothing worked. Still get connected to Peers instead. Please help out guys! Actual Peer (131.120.141.34.bc.googleusercontent.com): Actual Peer (25.98.141.34.bc.googleusercontent.com): Best Regards, Adrian M.

Hello Liam, Fraser, As I can see in the table below the latest firmware (3.2 version) XR1000 has passed testing and has been sent to NETGEAR. Is there still some part of the verification which has to be done on their end? Are you still waiting for feedback from them? They did not publish anything here: https://www.netgear.com/support/download/?model=XR1000&_ga=2.150929780.336497755.1655151669-1167615601.1655151669 Best Regards, Adrian M.

Hello Liam, Fraser, When will DumaOS 3.2 version be available for consumers? Is there a due date for the 3.2 final release? All I know so far is this: Best Regards, Adrian M.