Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'qos'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • News & Community
    • News & Announcements
    • Feature Ideas & Improvements for DumaOS
    • Community Discussion
  • Support
    • Knowledge Base
    • Latest Firmwares
    • DumaOS on NETGEAR Nighthawk Support
    • DumaOS on Netduma R1 Support (Open Beta)
    • Original Netduma R1 Firmware Support
    • Black Ops 4 Support
    • New Games for the Geo-Filter
  • Duma Army Lounge
    • Gamer Talk
    • TechnoBabble
    • Off Topic
  • International Language Forums
    • NETDUMA Deutsch
    • NETDUMA Español
    • NETDUMA Français
  • 1 on 1 Support
    • Request 1 on 1

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 13 results

  1. Hello, since a few weeks I can't reach 300/300mb with the netduma, the download speed is perfect being 298mb disabling the Qos as I don't use it, for reach my full speeds but the upload speeds can't reach more than 20mb. I tested switching ports on the duma and my isp router and also switching ethernet cat7 cables but nothing. If I connect my pc wired to the isp router I reach 298/295. So the problem is the duma. What can I do? Help please.
  2. Hello I have a quick question. I have my PS4 to receive 60% of the bandwidth on download and upload and my fire stick has 30% etc. When the PS4 is switched off will it’s 60% be split between the remaining devices on the network or will the fire stick only ever receive 30% no matter if the PS4 is turned on or off. Thanks
  3. Hi all, Ive been running some ping plotter tests and ive found some interesting results. Ive got my QOS set to 70/70 with the anti-bufferbloat as always on. As you can see the results aren't very promising. I've pinged multiple ip's with near enough same results. Ive been running these tests throughout the day whilst other devices have been streaming content, surfing the web etc.. From what I understand, the QOS should prevent all local congestion from allowing my ping to spike. So why am I still getting this?
  4. Hola, me acabo de dar cuenta que al establecer mis ajustes en el Qos ajustando los sliders a 70% cada uno y activando el when high prioritization detected, Fortnite no es detectado al jugar por lo que supongo que es como si los sliders estuvieran al 100% ocasionando pequeños tirones jugando ya que hay miembros de mi familia que estarían viendo Netflix o youtube. Como podría arreglarlo? Gracias por la ayuda.
  5. So got the router and a new modem (xr500 with netgear 3.1 docsis) set up was fine pc is connected via lan cat 7 cable. However my smart tv, laptop and phone are experiencing abnormal amount of lag vs my crappy old lynksys ea6350 before I could press an app and it and all content is loaded, now say I open speed test it will take up to 2 min to detect I have Cox internet and another 16 seconds average to find a server. Opening youtube will do the same app opens but it hangs on a blank page for an excessive amount of time before showing me content. I have ipv6 set up ip address is dynamic given by Isp, I have used ips dns and used dns benchmark to find the best dns servers (google, time Warner then 1.1.1.) I have two filter set up only for my pc and antibuffer scores a consistent A+ ping to Google is 25 ms I'm using 90% of 550 mbps data and I have tried giving Wi-Fi devices 50% or the auto 20% speeds yet speed test always says a device reaches 400 mbps (via wifi) I just don't know what I can do about it. Any suggestions anyone else have this problem. My phone now runs faster and more reliable with one bar of LTE....
  6. I have a 1.2 Gbps connection is it necessary to enable Q.O.S. on the XR500? I noticed that I take a speed hit when it is enabled Doesn't the DOCSIS 3.1 modems have built in Q.O.S.?
  7. I previously submitted a post regarding bittorrent traffic being recognized as "high priority traffic" in the QoS settings therefore dropping total download speed. The Tl:dr of the resolution of that post was "watch your port numbers" HOWEVER i have noticed something in particular that i feel the duma team should investigate on. I have realized that no matter which ports i use on specifically the " qBittorrent " client even when duma classified games is turned off it would detect some packets as high priority which triggers the antibufferbloat. Its not a lot of high priority packets but enough to keep the antibufferbloat in a permanent on/off situation. I would say every 25 sec it triggers 1 high priority packet that turns on the antibufferbloat. I thought this was odd so i tried 2 different bittorrent clients to download the same file with same designated ports and to my surprise no high priority traffic is detected it only happens on the qBittorrent client. It would be great if the Duma team could replicate this and see what is causing the problem. TlDr qbittorrent client triggers high priority traffic while other competing clients like uTorrent do not.
  8. I have been using buffer-bloat set to automatic when high priority traffic is detected and its been working great. My only problem is that when i download a torrent it detects it as high priority limiting the amount of download bandwidth it can grab. In most cases when i start a torrent i want it to take all my bandwidth so this has become a problem for me. I made sure that the custom ports i set up for high priority didn't match the port setting of the torrent client but the problem still persists. turning off anti buffer-bloat every time i start a torrent is something id like to avoid. Is there any way to stop the torrent client from being read as high priority?
  9. As soon as i got my xr500 i went ahead and updated to latest firmware which is currently v2.3.2.32. I managed to set up anti-bufferbloat and bandwidth allocation and its working wonders ! (props to netduma team ! ) the only problem is that i want to run it when it recognizes game traffic but the red light wont light up when i launch league of legends even though DumaOS Classified Games is set to enabled and even when a a custom rule is set for the the pc playing it. I also tried adding the manual lol ports but i keep receiving an error message: RPC error 'ERROR_UNKNOWN': bad argument #1 to 'len' (string expected, got nil) -> stack traceback: ?: in function <?:73> [C]: in function 'len' ?: in function '?' ?: in function 'decode' ?: in function <?:50> (tail call): ? ?: in function <?:324> [C]: in function 'xpcall' ?: in function 'try' ?: in function <?:290> [C]: in function 'run' ?: in function <?:345> [C]: in function 'xpcall' ?: in function 'try' ?: in function <?:261> (tail call): ? /dumaos/api/cli.lua:48: in function </dumaos/api/cli.lua:30> [C]: in function 'xpcall' /dumaos/api/cli.lua:59: in main chunk [C]: ? I tried playing Overwatch and it gets recognized immediately working as it should. So question is, why is league of legends not being detected and why cant i add the ports manually? any help would be appreciated since league is the main game i play everything else is prefect Overclocked
  10. Well I bit the bullet and I am giving the Xr500 another chance. If I put the PS4 in the DMZ will the router still do what it is intended to do with the anti bufferbloat and QOS prioritization settings? Or does the DMZ override all that? I will work with you guys and see if I can actually enjoy everything this has to offer along with enjoying my games!
  11. I have my sliders set to 70/70 and the duma said it applied and i also have duma set to always. my gf is streaming right now and i am laggy which usually doesnt happen unless my qos isnt set so i did a speedtest and im getting full speeds.
  12. I've been trying to specifically limit my PS4 vicariously through my laptop... So, I've been trying to find the sweet "buffer bloat" spot by testing my laptop in various settings... unfortunately I can't set a fixed speed for it... Capping my upload & download for the purposes of streaming isn't a viable option because I stream at 1080p @ 8Mbps. I have FIOS 300/300 and it would only make sense that I should be able to set apart something similar to a QOS. If I cap my UP & Down at 80% My Primary Router is the Netduma R1 and all the devices go either directly to the Netduma or connect via an 8-port switch to the Netduma. It seems like a poor design to not be able to set a finite speed, also I was considering having a 2Gbps line run... I noticed that the cap can go no lower than 10%... trying to achieve this prompts errors... According to the link on the bottom of the page, 11 months ago, you folks were going to release a feature that allowed this on the "next update"... I'm sure we many many many updates into the future... Not trying to blast anyone here... just trying to figure out how we CAN truly make this the BEST gaming Router in the World. At this point I'm simply better for the money with a Nighthawk... QOS seemed to work better for me when I was using it as I could use QOS on a per device basis... and it was set it and forget it... http://forum.netduma.com/topic/14374-feature-request-limit-uploaddownload-to-specific-speeds-for-specific-devices/
  13. Hi, Is there any software option to allow a specified device to bypass the congestion control of the Duma (or even something like allowing a device to be part of a DMZ under the Duma?). If not, is this something that could be implemented into the Duma interface? NetDuma's "Reactive" congestion control setting stops the VPN that I have to use on my work's laptop from connecting. Setting it to "Preemptive" allows it to connect just fine, however I can only achieve top speed of 25Mbs on a wired connection this way (of a 200Mbps service that normally I achieve consistently) which is too slow given the volume of data I need to transfer for work. I don't know what protocols the VPN uses (but the software is "GlobalProtect" by Palo Alto Networks). I get similar issues when trying to use my own L2TP VPN I have set up - Reactive blocks it whereas Preemptive allows it (I raised this in a previous post a while back but it seems to have disappeared now). Currently the hierarchy I have is VM Superhub (modem mode) --> Duma (router) --> Nighthawk (wifi only). I'm reluctant to change the hierarchy of my hardware devices in order to achieve this though - one of the key reasons I bought the Duma is for its congestion control/QoS (which has worked very well for me so far), and changing the order would result in all Wifi devices bypassing Duma's congestion control by connecting to the Nighthawk above it; or alternatively I could limit that to specific devices but would have to rely on the NetDuma wifi for others, but this is notably not as well-performing as the Nighthawk's is. Would appreciate thoughts. Thanks, NeeWii
×
×
  • Create New...